USSC Public Hearing - July 15, 2024

1. UNITED DISTRICT COURT 2. NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3. Bright Quang | Case No. 24-cv-08512-AGT 4. Plaintiff, | 5. | ORDER SEEKING CLARIFICATION 6. | Alex G. Tse 7. | United States Magistrate Judge 8. V, | Self-Help: Bright Quang 7 JOHN. F. KENNEDY, e al, | 430 1st Ave, Redwood City, CA 94063 9. Defendants | Phone: 650-278-9542 10. _______________________ |_ Email. quangbright@gmail.com 11. IT IS SO ORDER 12. ORDER SEEKING CLARIFICATION 13. In two related civil cases, Bright Quang is suing the United States or former U.S officials for acts 14. that took place during or after the Vietnam War. In the first case, Quang v. United States, 24-cv- 15. 01328-AGT, Quang applied to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court granted his application. In 16. the second case (the instant case). Quang paid the filing fee, but he also attached an forma 17. pauperis 18. apply depending on whether Quang proceeds in forma pauperis or not. See 28 U.S.C. 1915; 19. Moore v. Maricopa Cnty. Sheriff’s Off., 657 F.3d 890.892 20. (9th Cir. 2011) (Nothing that “[a] II persons, not just prisoners, may seek IEP status”). The Court 21. thus seeks clarification from Quang. Does he intend to proceed in forma pauperis in this case, 22. too? If he does, the Court will refund the fee. If he doesn’t intend to proceed in forma pauperis, 23. the Court will preserve the status quo: The filing fee will remain paid, the in forma pauperis rules 24. won’t apply, and Quang will be responsible for serving the defendants with process. Quang must 25. respond to this order by April23, 2025. 26. IT IS SO ORDERED 27. Alex G. Tse United States Magistrate Judge 28. DATED: April 7, 2025 . 1. The plaintiff’s Bright Quang would like to be clarification of order seeking by the Court and he would 2. first like to self- introduce the case of prisoner of war and secondly the pauperism situation of his life by 3. the template pauperism. 4The worsened problems of the Vietnam War to take place upon his settlement lawsuit have been raised for 5.two cases when he has based on the Vietnam War and the indigenous laws and the United States 6. Constitution. Just because the United States has never kept a few honorable promises in the Vietnam War, 7. the United States has been violated from indigenous laws and the United States Constitution. In the 8.meanwhile, the United States has prided itself on all of multilateral and bilateral treaties of the United States 9. that solemnly signed with the Republic of Vietnam on the Vietnam War from the decades in the forty, fifty, 10.sixty, and seventy in the past. On the other hand, the United States hasn't kept its voices together with its 11. works, so the worsened matters had taken place in the Vietnam War and rose to his life, his people, and his 13.sacred nation. For those reasons, he can't describe adequately details in the Vietnam War while the end of 14. Vietnam War by the international multilateral agreement- when this treaty's mastermind has built from the 15. powerful political American leaders- Therefore, he would like to copped an original Paris Peace Accords 16. because this treaty was to be the mainstream American law by 1 USC 113 "- a little and brown's" edition of 17. laws and treaties; slip laws; treaties and other international Acts Series; admissibility in evidence ( July 30, 18. 1947) and here: 19.No. 13295 20.(a) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF VIET-NAM, PROVISIONAL 21. REVOLUTIONARY GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH VIET-NAM and REPUBLIC 22.OF VIET-NAM Agreement on ending the war and restoring peace in Viet-Nam. Signed at Paris on 27 23.January 1973 Authentic texts : English and Vietnamese. (A) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and 24.DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF VIET-NAM Agreement on ending the war and restoring peace in Viet- 25.Nam. Signed at Paris on 27 January 1973 authentic texts: English and Vietnamese. Registered by the 26.United States of America on 13 May 1974. (ab) CAMBODIA, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF VIET- 27.NAM, FRANCE, LAOS, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, STATE OF VIET-NAM, UNION OF 28.SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN 1. IRELAND and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Final Declaration of the Geneva Conference on the 2. Problem of restoring peace in Indo-China (with (1) declarations by Cambodia, France, Laos, the State of 3. Viet-Nam and the United States of America; (2) the Agreement on the cessation of hostilities in Viet-Nam 4. between the Commander-in-Chief of the People's Army of Viet-Nam and the Commander-in-Chief of the 5. French Union Forces in Indo-China, signed at Geneva on 20 July 1954 (with maps); (3) the Agreement on 6. the cessation of hostilities in Laos between the Commander-in-Chief of the forces of the French Union in 7. Indo-China, on the one hand, and the Commanders-in-Chief of the fighting units of " Pathet- Lao ' ' and of the 8. People’s Army of Viet-Nam, on the other hand, done at Geneva on 20 July 1954, and (4) the Agreement on 9. the cessation of hostilities in Cambodia between the Commander- in-Chief of the Khmer National Armed 10. Forces, on the one hand, and the Commanders-in-chief of the Khmer Resistance Forces and of the Viet- 11. Namese Military Units, on the other hand, done at Geneva on 20 July 1954). Done at Geneva on 21 July 12. 1954. Authentic text of the Final Declaration: French. Authentic texts of the related declarations: French 13. and English. Authentic texts of the Agreement on the cessation of hostilities in Viet-Nam: French and 14. Vietnamese. Authentic texts of the Agreements on the cessation of hostilities in Laos and in Cambodia: 15.French. Texts communicated on 15 January 1975 to the Secretariat by the Government of the United States 16. of America, for the purpose of information and in connexion with the registration of the Paris agreements of 17. 27 January 1973. (Maps Nos. 1 to 6 annexed to the Agreement on the cessation of hostilities in Viet-Nam 18. were supplied by the French Government.) No. 13295 United Nations — Treaty Series 1974 19. AGREEMENT1 ON ENDING THE WAR AND RESTORING PEACE IN VIET-NAM the Parties 20 participating in the Paris Conference on Viet-Nam, With a view to ending the war and restoring peace in 21.Viet-Nam on the basis of respect for the Vietnamese people's fundamental national rights and the South 22. Vietnamese people's right to self-determination, and to contributing to the consolidation of peace in Asia 23. and the world have agreed on the following provisions and undertake to respect and to implement them: 24. Chapter I THE VIETNAMESE PEOPLE'S FUNDAMENTAL NATIONAL RIGHTS 25. Article 1 26. The United States and all other countries respect the independence, sovereignty, unity, and territorial 27. integrity of Viet-Nam as recognized by the 1954 Geneva Agreements on Viet-Nam. 28. 2 Chapter II 1.CESSATION OF HOSTILITIES; WITHDRAWAL OF TROOPS 2. Article 2 3. A cease-fire shall be observed throughout South Viet-Nam as of 2400 hours G.M.T., on January 27, 1973. 4. At the same hour, the United States will stop all its military activities against the territory of the Democratic 5. Republic of Viet-Nam by ground, air and naval forces, wherever they may be based, and end the mining of 6. the territorial waters, ports, harbors, and waterways of the Democratic Republic of Viet-Nam. The United 7. States will remove, permanently deactivate or destroy all the mines in the territorial waters, ports, harbors, 8. and waterways of North Viet-Nam as soon as this Agreement goes into effect. The complete cessation of 9. hostilities mentioned in this Article shall be durable and without limit of time. 1 Came into force on 27 10. January 1973 by signature, in accordance with article 23. Z See p. 95 of this volume. 11.No. 13295 1974 Nations Unites — Recueil des Traités 12.Article 3 13.The parties undertake to maintain the cease-fire and to ensure a lasting and stable peace. As soon as the 14. Cease-fire goes into effect: 15. (a) The United States forces and those of the other foreign countries allied with the United States and the 16. Republic of Viet-Nam shall remain in-place pending the implementation of the plan of troop withdrawal. 17. The Four- Party Joint Military Commission described in Article 16 shall determine the modalities. 18. (b) The armed forces of the two South Vietnamese parties shall remain in-place. 19. The Two-Party Joint Military Commission described in Article 17 shall determine the areas controlled by 20.each party and the modalities of stationing. 21. (c) The regular forces of all services and arms and the irregular forces of the parties in South Viet-Nam shall 22. stop all offensive activities against each other and shall strictly abide by the following stipulations : All acts 23. of force on the ground, in the air, and on the sea shall be prohibited; All hostile acts, terrorism and reprisals 24.by both sides will be banned. 25. Articles 4 26. The United States will not continue its military involvement or 24.intervene in the internal affairs of South 27.Viet-Nam. 28. Article 5 1. Within sixty days of the signing of this Agreement, there will be a total withdrawal from South Viet-Nam of 2. troops, military advisers, and military personnel, including technical military personnel and military personnel 3. also cited with the pacification program, armaments, munitions, and war material of the United States and 4. those of the other foreign countries mentioned in Article 3 5. (a). Advisers from the above-mentioned countries 5. 6. To all paramilitary organizations and the police force will also be withdrawn within the same period of time. 7. Article 6 8. The dismantlement of all military bases in South Viet-Nam of the United States and of the other foreign 9. countries mentioned in Article 3 (a) shall be completed within sixty days of the signing of this Agreement. 10. United Nations No: N3295 United Nations — Treaty Series 1974 11. Article 7 12. From the enforcement of the cease-fire to the formation of the government provided for in 12. Articles 9 (b) and 14 of this Agreement, the two South Viet namese parties shall not accept the introduction 13. of troops, military 15.advisers, and military personnel including technical military personnel, armaments, 14. munitions, and war material into South Viet-Nam. The two South Vietnamese parties shall be permitted to 15. make periodic replacement of armaments, munitions and war material which have been destroyed, 16. damaged, worn out or used up after the cease-fire, on the basis of piece-for-piece, of the same characteristics 17. and properties, under the supervision of the Joint Military Commission of the two South Vietnamese parties 18. and of the International Commission of Control and Supervision. 19. Chapter III 20. THE RETURN OF CAPTURED MILITARY PERSONNEL AND FOREIGN CIVILIANS, 21. AND CAPTURED AND DETAINED VIETNAMESE CIVILIAN PERSONNEL 22. Article 8 23. (a) The return of captured military personnel and foreign civilians of the parties shall be carried out 24. simultaneously with and completed not later than the same day as the troop withdrawal mentioned in 25. Article 5. The parties shall exchange complete lists of the above-mentioned captured military personnel and 26. foreign civilians on the day of the signing of this Agreement. 27. (b) The parties shall help each other to get information about those military personnel and foreign civilians 28. of the parties missing in action, to determine the location and take care of the graves of the dead so as to 1. facilitate the exhumation and repatriation of the remains, and to take any such other measures as may be 2. required to get information about those still considered missing in action. 3. (c) The question of the return of Vietnamese civilian personnel captured and detained in South Viet-Nam will 4. be resolved by the two South Vietnamese parties on the basis of the principles of Article 21 (b) of the 5.Agreement on the Cessation of Hostilities in Viet-Nam of July 20, 1954.1 The two South Vietnamese parties 6. will do so in a spirit of national reconciliation and concord, with a view to ending hatred and enmity, in 7. orders to ease suffering and to reunite families. The two South Vietnamese parties will do their utmost to 8. resolve this question within ninety days after the cease-fire comes into effect. 9 (cited1 See p. 149 of this volume.) 10. No. 13295 1974 Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 11. Chapter IV 12. THE EXERCISE OF THE SOUTH VIETNAMESE PEOPLE'S RIGHT TO SELF- DETERMINATION 13. Article 9 14. The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Democratic Republic of Viet- 15. Nam undertake to respect the following principles for the exercise of the South Vietnamese people's right to 16. self- determination : 17. (a) The South Vietnamese people's right to self-determination is sacred, inalienable, and shall be respected 18. by all countries. 19. (b) The South Vietnamese people shall decide themselves the political future of South Viet-Nam through 20. genuinely free and democratic general elections under international supervision. 21. (c) Foreign countries shall not impose any political tendency or personality on the South Vietnamese people. 22. Article 10 23. The two South Vietnamese parties undertake to respect the cease-fire and maintain peace in South Viet- 24. Nam, settles all matters of contention through negotiations, and avoids all armed conflict. 25. Article 11 26.Immediately after the cease-fire, the two South Vietnamese parties will: achieve national 27. reconciliation and concord, end hatred and enmity, prohibit all acts of reprisal and discrimination against 28. individuals or organizations that have collaborated with one side or the other; ensure the democratic liberties 1. of the people: personal freedom, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of meeting, freedom of 2. organization, freedom of political activities, freedom of belief, freedom of movement, freedom of residence, 3. freedom of work, right to property ownership, and right to free enterprise. 4. Article 12 5. (a) Immediately after the cease-fire, the two South Vietnamese parties shall hold consultations in a spirit of 6. national reconciliation and concord, 7. N° 13295 10 United Nations — Treaty 'Series 1974 (page) 8. mutual respect, and mutual non-elimination to set up a National Council of National Reconciliation and 9. Concord of three equal segments. The Council shall operate on the principle of unanimity. After the 10. National Council of National Reconciliation and Concord has assumed its functions, the two South 11. Vietnamese parties will consult about the formation of councils at lower levels. The two South Vietnamese 12. parties shall sign an agreement on the internal matters of South Viet-Nam as soon as possible and do their 13. utmost to accomplish this within ninety days after the cease-fire conies into effect, in keeping with the South 14. Vietnamese people's aspirations for peace, independence and democracy. 15. (b) The National Council of National Reconciliation and Concord shall have the task of promoting the two 16. South Vietnamese parties' implementation of this Agreement, achievement of national reconciliation and 17. Concord and ensurance of democratic liberties. The National Council of National Reconciliation and 18. Concord will organize the free and democratic general elections provided for in Article 9 (b) and decide the 19. procedures and modalities of these general elections. The institutions for which the general elections are to 20. be held will be agreed upon through consultations between the two South Vietnamese parties. The National 21. Council of National Reconciliation and Concord will also decide the procedures and modalities of such 22. local elections as the two South Vietnamese parties agree upon. 23. Article 13. 24. The question of Vietnamese armed forces in South Viet-Nam shall be settled by the two South Vietnamese 25. parties in a spirit of national reconciliation and concord, equality and mutual respect, without foreign 26. interference, in accordance with the postwar situation. Among the questions to be discussed by the two 27. South Vietnamese parties are steps to reduce their military effectives and to demobilize the troops being 28. reduced. The two South Vietnamese parties will accomplish this as soon as possible. 1. Article 14 South Viet-Nam will pursue a foreign policy of peace and independence. It will be prepared to 2. establish relations with all countries irrespective of their political and social systems on the basis of mutual 3. respect for independence and sovereignty and accept economic and technical aid from any country with no 4. Political conditions attached. The acceptance of military aid by South Viet-Nam in the future shall come 5. under the authority of the government set up after the general elections in South Viet-Nam provided for in 6. Article 9 7. (£»). No. 13295 1974 Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 8. Chapter V 9. THE REUNIFICATION OF VlET-NAM AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NORTH AND SOUTH 10. VIET-NAM 11. Article 15 12. The reunification of Viet-Nam shall be carried out step by step through peaceful means on the basis of 13. discussions and agreements between North and South Viet-Nam, without coercion or annexation by either 14. Party, and without foreign interference. The time for reunification will be agreed upon by North and South 15. Viet-Nam. 16. Pending reunification : 17. (a) The military demarcation line between the two zones at-the 17th parallel is only provisional and not a 18. political or territorial boundary, as provided for in paragraph 6 of the Final Declaration of the 1954 Geneva 19. Conference. 20. (b) North and South Viet-Nam shall respect the Demilitarized Zone on either side of the Provisional 21. Military Demarcation Line. 22. (c) North and South Viet-Nam shall promptly start negotiations with a view to re-establishing normal 23. relations in various fields. Among the questions to be negotiated are the modalities of civilian movement 24. across the Provisional Military Demarcation Line. (d) North and South Viet-Nam shall not join any military 25. alliance or military bloc and shall not allow foreign powers to maintain military bases, troops, military 26. advisers, and military personnel on their respective territories, as stipulated in the 1954 Geneva Agreements 27. on Viet-Nam. 28. Chapter VI 1.THE JOINT MILITARY COMMISSIONS, THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION OF CONTROL AND 2. SUPERVISION, THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 3. Article 16 4. (a) The Parties participating in the Paris Conference on Viet-Nam shall immediately designate representatives 5. to form a Four-Party Joint Military Commission with the task of ensuring joint action by the parties in 6. implementing the following provisions of this Agreement: 7. _The first paragraph of Article 2, regarding the enforcement of the cease-fire throughout South Viet-Nam; 8. _ Article 3 (a), regarding the cease-fire by US forces and those of the other foreign countries referred to in 9. that Article; 10. (cited)1 See p. 95 of this volume. N 13295 12_________United Nations — Treaty Series________1974 11._Article 3 (c), regarding the cease-fire between all parties in South Viet-Nam; 12._Article 5, regarding the withdrawal from South Viet-Nam of US troops and those of the other foreign 13. countries mentioned in Article 3 (a); 14.—Article 6, regarding the dismantlement of military bases in South Viet-Nam of the United States and those 15. of the other foreign countries mentioned in Article 3 (a); 16._Article 8 (a), regarding the return of captured military personnel and foreign civilians of the parties; 17._ Article 8 (b), regarding the mutual assistance of the parties in getting information about those military 18. personnel and foreign civilians of the parties missing in action. 19. (b ) The Four-Party Joint Military Commission shall operate in accordance with the principle of 20. consultations and unanimity. Disagreements shall be referred to the International Commission of Control 21. and Supervision. 22. (c) The Four-Party Joint Military Commission shall begin operating immediately after the signing of this 22. Agreement and end its activities in sixty days, after the completion of the withdrawal of US troops and those 23. of the other foreign countries mentioned in Article 3 (a) and the completion of the return of captured 24. military personnel and foreign civilians of the parties. 25 (d) The four parties shall agree immediately on the organization, the working procedure, means of activity, 26. and expenditures of the Four-Party Joint Military Commission. 27. Article 17 28. (d) The two South Vietnamese parties shall immediately designate representatives to form a Two-Party Joint 1. Military Commission with the task of ensuring joint action by the two South Vietnamese parties in 2. implementing the following provisions of this Agreement : 3. _The first paragraph of Article 2, regarding the enforcement of the cease-fire throughout South Viet-Nam, 4. when the Four-Party Joint Military Commission has ended its activities; 5. _Article 3 (b), regarding the cease-fire between the two South Vietnamese parties; 6. _Article 3 (c), regarding the cease-fire between all parties in South Viet-Nam, when the Four-Party Joint 7. Military Commission has ended its activities; 8. _Article 7, regarding the prohibition of the introduction of troops 9. into South Viet-Nam and all other provisions of this Article; 10. _Article 8 (c), regarding the question of the return of Vietnamese civilian personnel captured and detained 11. in South Viet-Nam ; 12. No. 13295 1974 Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 13 13. _Article 13, regarding the reduction of the military effectives of the two South Vietnamese parties and the 14. demobilization of the troops being reduced. 15. (b) Disagreements shall be referred to the International Commission of Control and Supervision. 16. (c) After the signing of this Agreement, the Two-Party Joint Military Commission shall agree immediately 17. on the measures and organization aimed at enforcing the cease-fire and preserving peace in South Viet- 18. Nam. 19. Article 18 20. (a) After the signing of this Agreement, an International Commission of Control and Supervision shall be 21. established immediately. 22. (b) Until the International Conference provided for in Article 19 makes definitive arrangements, the 23. International Commission of Control and Super vision will report to the four parties on matters concerning 24. the control and supervision of the implementation of the following provisions of this Agreement : 25. _The first paragraph of Article 2, regarding the enforcement of the cease-fire throughout South Viet-Nam; 26. _Article 3 (a), regarding the cease-fire by US forces and those of the other foreign countries referred to in 27. that Article; 28. _Article 3 (c), regarding the cease-fire between all the parties in South Viet- Nam; 1. _Article 5, regarding the withdrawal from South Viet-Nam of US troops and those of the other foreign 2. countries mentioned in Article 3 (a) ; 3. —Article 6, regarding the dismantlement of military bases in South Viet-Nam of the United States and 4. those of the other foreign countries mentioned in Article 3 (a) ; 5. _Article 8 (a), regarding the return of captured military personnel and foreign civilians of the parties. The 6. International Commission of Control and Supervision shall form control teams for carrying out its tasks. 7. The four parties shall agree immediately on the location and operation of these teams. The parties will 8. their operation facilitate n. 9. facilitate (c) Until the International Conference makes definitive arrangements, 10. the International Commission of Control and Supervision will report to the two South Vietnamese parties 11. on matters concerning the control and supervision of the implementation of the following provisions of this 12. Agreement: 13. _The first paragraph of Article 2, regarding the enforcement of the cease-fire throughout South Viet-Nam, 14. when the Four-Party Joint Military Commission has ended its activities; 15. N 13295 14_________United Nations — Treaty Series________1974 16. _Article 3 (b), regarding the cease-fire between the two South Vietnamese parties; 17. _Article 3 (c), regarding the cease-fire between all parties in South Viet-Nam, when the Four-Party Joint 18. Military Commission has ended its activities; 19. _Article 7, regarding the prohibition of the introduction of troops into South Viet-Nam and all other 20. provisions of this Article; 21. _Article 8 (c), regarding the question of the return of Vietnamese civilian personnel captured and detained 22. in South Viet-Nam; 23. _Article 9 24. (b ), regarding the free and democratic general elections in South Viet-Nam; 25. _Article 13, regarding the reduction of the military effectives of the two South Vietnamese parties and the 26. demobilization of the troops being reduced. 27. The International Commission of Control and Supervision shall form control teams for carrying out its 28. tasks. The two South Vietnamese parties shall agree immediately on the location and operation of these 1. teams. The two South Vietnamese parties will facilitate their operation, 2. (d) The International Commission of Control and Supervision shall be composed of representatives of four 3. countries : Canada, Hungary, Indonesia and Poland. The chairmanship of this Commission will rotate 4. among the members for specific periods to be determined by the Commission. 5. (e) The International Commission of Control and Supervision shall carry out its tasks in accordance with 6. the principle of respect for the sovereignty of South Viet-Nam. 7. (f) The International Commission of Control and Supervision shall operate in accordance with the principle 8. of consultations and unanimity. 9. (g) The International Commission of Control and Supervision shall begin operating when a cease-fire 10. comes into force in Viet-Nam. As regards the provisions in Article 18 (b) concerning the four parties, the 11. International Commission of Control and Supervision shall end its activities when the Commission's tasks 12. of control and supervision regarding these provisions have been fulfilled. As regards the provisions in 13. Article 18 (c) concerning the two South Vietnamese parties, the International Commission of Control and 14. Supervision shall end its activities on the request of the government formed after the general elections in 15. South Viet-Nam provided for in Article 9 (b). 16. (h) The four parties shall agree immediately on the organization, means of activity, and expenditures of the 17. International Commission of Control and Supervision. The relationship between the International 18. Commission and the International Conference will be agreed upon by the International Commission and the 19. International Conference. 20. No. 13295 1974 Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités Article 15 21. Article 19 22. The parties agree on the convening of an International Conference within thirty days of the signing of this 23. Agreement to acknowledge the signed agreements; to guarantee the ending of the war, the maintenance of 24. peace in Viet- Nam, the respect of the Vietnamese people's fundamental national rights, and the South 25. Vietnamese people's right to self-determination; and to contribute to and guarantee peace in Indochina. 26. The United States and the Democratic Republic of Viet-Nam, on behalf of the parties participating in the 27. Paris Conference on Viet-Nam, will propose to the following parties that they participate in this 28. International Conference : the People's Republic of China, the Republic of France, the Union of Soviet 1. Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom, the four countries of the International Commission of Control and 2. Supervision, and the Secretary-General of the United Nations, together with the parties participating in the 3. Paris Conference on Viet-Nam. 4. Chapter VII REGARDING CAMBODIA AND LAOS 5. Article 20 6. (a) The parties participating in the Paris Conference on Viet-Nam shall strictly respect the 1954 Geneva 7. Agreements on Cambodia1 and the 1962 Geneva Agreements on Laos,2 which recognized the Cambodian 8. and the Lao peoples' fundamental national rights, i.e., the independence, sovereignty, unity, and territorial 9. integrity of these countries. The parties shall respect the neutrality of Cambodia and Laos. The parties 10. participating in the Paris Conference on Viet-Nam undertake to refrain from using the territory of 11. Cambodia and the territory of Laos to encroach on the sovereignty and security of one another and of other 12. countries. 13. (b) Foreign countries shall put an end to all military activities in Cambodia and Laos, totally withdraw 14. from and refrain from reintroducing into these two countries troops, military advisers and military 15. personnel, armaments, munitions and war material. 16. (c) The internal affairs of Cambodia and Laos shall be settled by the people of each of these countries 17. without foreign interference. 18. (d) The problems existing between the Indochinese countries shall be settled by the Indochinese parties on 19. the basis of respect for each other's independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, and non- 20. interference in each other's internal affairs. 21. 1 2 See p. 185 of this volume. United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 456, p. 301. N 13295 16 United Nations 22. — Treaty Series 1974 23. Chapter VIII 24. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND THE DEMOCRATIC 25. REPUBLIC OF VIET-NAM 26. Article 21 27. The United States anticipates that this Agreement will usher in an era of reconciliation with the Democratic 28. Republic of Viet-Nam as with all the peoples of Indochina. In pursuance of its traditional policy, the United 1.States will contribute to healing the wounds of war and to postwar reconstruction of the Democratic Republic 2. of Viet-Nam and throughout Indochina. 3. Article 22 4. The ending of the war, the restoration of peace in Viet-Nam, and the strict implementation of this 5. Agreement will create conditions for establishing a new, equal and mutually beneficial relationship between 6. the United States and the Democratic Republic of Viet-Nam on the basis of respect for each of 7. Independence and sovereignty, and non-interference in each other's internal affairs. At the same time this 8. will ensure stable peace in Viet-Nam and con tribute to the preservation of lasting peace in Indochina and 9. Southeast Asia. 10. Chapter IX 11. OTHER PROVISIONS 12. Article 23 13. This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature by plenipotentiary representatives of the parties 14. participating in the Paris Conference on Viet-Nam. All the parties concerned shall strictly implement this 15. Agreement and its Proto cols. 16. DONE in Paris this twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and seventy-three, in 17. English and Vietnamese. The English and Vietnamese texts are official and equally authentic. 18. No. 13295 1974 Nations United — Recueil des Traités 19. For the Government of the United States of America : 20. [Signed] WILLIAM P. ROGERS Secretary of State For the Government of the Republic of Viet-Nam : 21. [Signed] TRAN VAN LAM Minister for Foreign Affairs 22. The plaintiff’ would like to submit this international agree or Multilateral treaties signed for the 23. Paris Peace Accords by this treaty is to be the mainstream American law that’s the end of the Vietnam War 24. after nearly thirty years of war of the United States has not only invaded sovereign Vietnam but also abused 25. one’s power to deprive the right to life of the Vietnamese people and Vietnam Armed Forces. Next, No 26. Articles and Chapters of this Paris Peace Accords detained him, nationalized property, and sold him to 27. mainland China or so-called Socialism which is why the United States has strongly been distorted its laws, 28. treaties, and Constitution, let the United States deprive the right to life of a Vietnamese officer to pauperism. 1. When he didn’t have violated to the sovereignty of the United States, terrorized to the United States, stolen 2. any pennies, the United States has been worsening treatment him. Let him carry out some of the United 3. States laws and Constitution to prove the frauds of the United States have been violated matters in the 4. Vietnam War. 5. The plaintiff’s Bright Quang would to submit this international agree or multilateral treaties signed for the 6. Paris Peace Accords by this treaty is to be the mainstream American law that’s the end of the Vietnam War 7. after nearly thirty years of war of the United States has not only invaded sovereign Vietnam but also abused 8. one’s power to deprive the right to life of the Vietnamese people and Vietnam Armed Forces. Next, No 9. Articles and Chapters of this Paris Peace Accords detained him, nationalized property, and sold him to 10. mainland China or so-called Socialism which is why the United States has strongly been distorted its laws, 11. treaties, and Constitution, let the United States deprive the right to life of a Vietnamese officer to 12. pauperism. When he hasn’t violated the sovereignty of the United States, terrorized the United States, 13. stolen any pennies, the United States has unkindly been treating him. Let him carry out some of the U.S. 14. laws and Constitution to prove the frauds of the United States have been violated matters in the Vietnam 15. War which is why the United States has the right to invade, subvert, assassinate, imprisoned and deprived 16. the right to life of him to be pauperism without having prosecuted to jurisdiction by American justice. Let 17. him carry out these indigenous laws and the Constitution. 18. Let the Court ought to understand about his legal lawsuit at this part while 18 U.S. Code § 1590 – 19. Trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, and forced labor, and Article thirteen 20. of the United States Constitution has ordered at-section 1. of the United States Constitution: Neither slavery 21. nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly 22. convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."- 23. Let him prove this Act- first, the United States didn't enforce the Paris Peace Accords while the Paris Peace 24. Accords didn't have any articles and chapters to sell him to communism. In the meantime, the United States 25. Senator Wayne Morse, he testified hearings before the United States Congress. Let the United States 26. Congress enact the law to fight against communism during Vietnam and the United States didn't terrorize 27. each other, not have animosity, and not violate the sovereignty to each other, which is why the United states 28. has abused one's power to seize the sovereignty of Vietnam, why did the United States deprive the right to 1. sovereign Vietnam under the label of anti- communism? But the US didn't defeat communism, the 2. United States has sold sovereign Vietnam to socialism. In the meanwhile, the United States has trafficked 3. Vietnamese officers to socialism after the United States cut and ran out of Vietnam on April 30, 1975. Why 4. did the United States abuse power to bully Vietnam to approve the Paris Peace Accords to detain one 5. excellent million soldiers to deprive them of the right to work? During the Vietnamese communist regime 6. has been tortured, freely murdered us without having sentenced the jurisdiction of judged, the U.S. didn't 7. respect any human rights when the US has been praising it by Civil Rights Act-1964, which is why 8. the United States has been killed the Vietnamese patriotic leaders during the United States used the jungle 9. laws in South Vietnam. Why didn't the United States allow us to evacuate from April 30, 1975, while the 10. United States Congress has stated and said, "America has no obligation with any Vietnamese -after that, the 11. United States has worried about Democratic Republic of Vietnam that should be overthrown by the former 12. Vietnam Armed Forces. It has been revolting to rebuild its government- for this reason; the United States 13. has brought back a few prisoners of war by zero dollars. 14. As a result, he came to the United States on November 22, 1993. What did he rebuild for life in the United 15. States? When he came to the United States, the United States didn't give him any pension benefits. That is 16. why the United States has been levied income taxes on the Vietnam War by a bilateral treaty? Since the 17. Amendment Twenty-six has no allowed any American leaders who had levied the income taxes on foreign 18. allies of the United States because the U.S has been taking for the American people income taxes, 19. the United States rebuilds the national America and services to the society which is why the United States 20. has levied on the Vietnamese people and soldiers- however, the United States didn't build modern Vietnam 21. to follow with 22 USC §2151-1 Congressional Finding and declaration of policy. Why did the United 22. States tenderly mobilize to fight against communism, but the United States has turned back guns to fight us 23. while the United States has self-torn its Paris Peace Accords? 24. He came to the United States when international operations Organization, it was donated to him to be 25. $2000.00, so the Department Human Services of San Mateo which has taking of the two thousand dollars – 26. while President Regan has order to each family that refugees to the United States to earn for seven months' 27. benefits by S. 484 (106 th): Bring them Home Alive Act of 20000 that A bill to provide for the granting of 28. refugee status in the United States to nationals of certain foreign countries in which American Vietnam War 1. ..POW/MIAs or American Korean War POW/MIAs may be present, if those nationals assist in the return to 2. the United States of those POW/MIAs alive. Next, he was not only imprisoned by the Paris Peace Accords 3. but also as a Vietnamese sculptor. When he was coming to the United States, the local government has 4. heinous treatment more than the American slavery pre-history because he was detained by the betrayal 5. American foreign policy in Vietnam to mobilize him and his national Vietnam to fight against communism 6. by the indigenous Act's H.R, 7885 Public Law 88_205 Approved December 16, 1963. While he has not 7. prosecuted crimes against the United States and the American people because he lived in his own sacred 8. national Vietnam which is why the United States Congress enacted this law to force him and his nation to 9. fight against communism during his Congress of the Republic of Vietnam didn't have the right to ratify this 10. Act. (This discrimination had been submitted to the Court already.) He had carried out Chapter 77- 11. peonage, slavery, and trafficking in persons ( 18 US Code§ 1590 Trafficking with respect to peonage, 12. Slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor. Moreover, when he came to the US, he was trained with 13. the lowest jobs. Together he worked with many American mental illnesses, but they were paid $7, 00.00 per 14. month when it paid him only $36.00 per month. While the local government didn't allow him to transfer to 15. any American Universities, the rules of the state of California required all students to work 32 hours per 16. week which is why it forced him to 40 hours per week. It didn't count the study time. For that reason, he 17. claimed to the state of California, let him ask for a hearing matter, so its decision was ordered, the lack of 18. jurisdiction of your right claims. (See San Mateo County-David Gilson, Administrative Law Judge-In the 19. matter of hearing #98187226- December 4, 1998. had submitted already) 20. Be carried out 1743 Perjury Overview of 18 US Code §§1621-1623, Even so, the Paris Peace Accords had 21. no detained any soldiers and officials and officers of the four parties which is why the United States has 22. brought its American prisoners of war in North Vietnam to go home- and then, the United States has 23. secretly exchanged the South troops, officers, and officials to replace of the American prisoners of war. 24. The Paris Peace Accords did not have ordered these prisoners of war which are why the South Vietnamese 25. Armed Forces were detained by the Paris Accords - for those reasons, the plaintiff's Bright Quang would 26. ask for the court, let the court make transparency's justice of the United States Constitution without having 27. .had motives political. 28. Be carried out 1 US code § 113 " Little & Brown's" July 30, 1947. 1. According to the indigenous law, the United States has edited, published, and openly stated international 2. treaties and bilateral treaties, but the United States didn't enforce it. the United States congress called for 3. perjury Acts- in fact, all of the United Laws and treaties were enacting for the Vietnam War in which 4. .included the International agreed and bilateral treaties for the Vietnam War and international relations 5 Protocols which are why the United States didn't enforce them- therefore, he expressed the law enforcement 6. them to be perjury acts. The most important of the Paris Peace Accords had ended the Vietnam War when the 7.United States has not only forced Vietnam that his President Nguyen Van Thieu whom must be endorsed by 8. the Congress of the Republic of Vietnam and the Vietnamese President, if nor, President Nixon, the United 9..States Congress, and Secretary of State Kissinger should be cut off a head's President Nguyen Van Thieu- 10.after President Nguyen Van Thieu has ratified the Paris Peace Accords had signed by four parties- and then, 11.President Nixon public stated on the worldwide and the American people to realize his spoken. “The Paris 12.Peace Accords will not have left anyone behind." That is why, after on January 27, 1975, the United States 13.secretly welcomed the North Vietnam troops and let them secretly move to the South Vietnam by day and 14. night to South Vietnam (See his settlement case was submitted to the Court). Especially, when he was South 15.Police Chief in Son Ha District, Quang Ngai, Vietnam, he was seen by eye and reported to both commanders 16. like Quang Ngai City and the American experts in Quang Ngai City. However, the American Experts didn't 17 allow the South Troops to fight against the North Troops. 20. As a result, he must carry out 28 US Code §§ 2071_ 2073- prosecute rules of evidence- just because 21.Secretary of State Kissinger has solemnly stated and spoken, “Vietnam failures we did to ourselves." 22.and “The Vietnam War required us to emphasize the national interest rather than abstract principles. What 23.President Nixon and I tried to do was unnatural. And that is why we didn't make it.” And then, The United 24.States has self-betrayed Vietnam. The United States abused power itself to have sold sovereign Vietnam to 25.communism before the United States has torn the Paris Peace Accords and all. 26. Finally, let him point out 28 USC § 1915: Moore v. Maricpoa City. Sheriff's Off, 657 F.3d 892 (9th Cir. 27.2011) noting that "[a]II persons, not just prisoners, may seek IFP status") 28. First, on whether Quang proceeds in forma pauperize or not. 1.First, to follow the Court ordered him, let him describe this matter. His claims have been obeyed by the 2.Clerk of Court Mark B. Busby who directly ordered him to do so. For the first time, he submitted his petition 3.without having had the forma Pauperize, So the clerk of Court denied and returned the document to him. 4.When he sent the template which was the forma pauperize, he then also obeyed him- however, he has been 5.asked for federal legal help Center by the clerk of Court directly ordered him- however, there didn't help 6. him, and second time he came to federal legal help Center in San Jose because there is the Asian lawyers, but 7.there spoken, here was unable to for more matters of your cases. As a result, he has self-helped to make 8. transparency justice when he would like to petition the Court. 9. First, on whether Quang proceeds in forma pauperize or not. 10. To follow the Court order, let him explain this matter. His claims have been obeyed by the Clerk of Court 11.Mark B. Busby who directly ordered him to do so. For the first time, he submitted his petition without 12. having had the template forma Pauperize, So the clerk of Court denied and returned the document to him. 13.When he sent the template which was the forma pauperize, he then also obeyed him- however, he has been 14.asked for federal legal help Center by the clerk of Court directly ordered him- however, there didn't help 15. him, and second time he came to federal legal help Center in San Jose because there is the Asian lawyers, 16. but there spoken, here was unable to too more cases' matters. As a result, he has self-helped within 17. transparency justice when he would like to petition to the Court. To carry out 28 US Code §1915, he would 18. obey the court when the Court requested him to be collateralized property. Even though he has predicted this 19.matter, he has been studying hard in education- therefore; he should be passed the graduates with a bachelor 20.degree in art and two years of the High Education from the American Universities. In condition, he has taken 21 advantage of the best place of the American University let him have been casting forty-two the American 22. President statues by the bronze and forty-two portraits in order to build intellectual property because art is 23.priceless rather than buying the house. For him predicted to be actually- however, the limitation of the 24. American University couldn't allow him to drag on education in the University, so goal just completed 25.two figures president's bronze and the forty-two painting portraits to proudly praise them- and then, he has 26.graduated a bachelor in art degree while he accumulated the student loans which was $12,895.00,to let 27.him build his website www.brightquang.net when he would sell his pieces of artwork and books. 28. So, yahoo. Small business discriminated against national color's his literature and linguistics because 1. his work-writing and art is "Truths are hard to swallow." Therefore, Yahoo, a small business, has secretly shut 2.down his website without having noticed. In case, the requesting of the Court has ordered him to collateralize 3.property, let the Court base on that could resolve his case. As he has mortgaged intellectual property that has 4.had the nineteenth books, forty-two President painting portraits, and two figures statues of President Abraham 5. Lincoln and President Bill Clinton which are over sixty bronze weights. 6.Second, as he has mortgaged intellectual property that has had the nineteenth books, forty-two President 7.painting portraits, and two figures statues' bronze of President Abraham Lincoln and President Bill Clinton 8.which are over sixty bronze weight and one Vietnamese Art book, as a result, the Court has accepted his 9 collateral intellectual property already, but the Court has not sent a receipt yet to him, he would remind there 10.without having requested a refund back because his first payment's 3: 24-cv- 08512- AGT that the Court has 11. sent a receipt to him, but the second one couldn't have it yet. 12. Finally, Prisoner of war was sent the template from the Clerk of Court's Mark B. Busby to him when he 14.followed it to do so. In comparison, his prisoners of war is different with the case of inmates Maricopa when 15..Maricopa who has been anti- the United States by his unlawful- however, the prisoner of war of the 14plaintiff's.Bright Quang has been petitioning for the transparency justice of the United States Constitution 15.while the United States Congress enacted law's one way, but acted the other. In fact, the United States 16.Congress enacted H.R. 7885 Public Law- 88-205 Approved December 16, 1963, 11.am, to let Congress 17.allow President John F. Kennedy to send the America Armed Forces to the highlands of sovereign Vietnam. 18. Let the America Armed Forces fight against communism which has not only destroyed the Capitalist system 19.but also terrorized American Security. That is why President Kennedy has not only assassinated the 20.Vietnamese President Ngo.Dinh Diem but also continued coup the government of the Republic of Vietnam to 21.the social disorders- while the Vietnamese communist has taken advantage of the coup and assassination on 22. South Vietnam- for those reasons have taken place, North Vietnam has strongly seized over 70% the local 23.governments of South Vietnam during North Vietnam has destroyed the strategic hamlet system of President 24.Ngo Dinh Diem policy. That is why the United States has distorted its Constitution and law; it has been risen 25.for the Prisoners of war which is why the Vietnamese Prisoners of war was raised by the fraud Paris Peace 26.Accords. The United States has solemnly kept its Paris Peace Accords in the mind of the United States 27Congress, so he couldn't come to here to struggle for equal transparency justice in the United States of 28.America without had motives political because Justice looks like oxygen if breathing stops, there is no 1. oxygen getting to the brain and cells begin to die. 2. Conclusion. I certify under Penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that foregoing 3. paragraph is true and correct. 4. Respectfully yours 5. Bright Quang 6. Date: April 18, 2025 Citation: I have submitted to the Clerk of Court already. 1. UNITED DISTRICT COURT 2. NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3. Bright Quang | Case No. 24-cv-01328-AGT 4. Plaintiff, | Alex G. Tse United States Magistrate Judge 5. | REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 6. V, | Self-Help: Bright Quang 7. UNITED STATES, | 430 1st Ave, Redwood City, CA 94063 8. Defendant | Phone: 650-278-9542 9. _______________________ |_ Email. quangbright@gmail.com 10. The Court has considered all filings postdating the screening order. To the extent that these 11. filings. Separate or together, are construed as plaintiff’s amended complaint, they haven’t 12. cured the deficiencies identified in the screening order. See DKt 7. Plaintiff alleges that 13. the United States acted improperly during after the Vietnam War. He hasn’t established a 14. waiver of sovereign immunity or stated and actionable claim for relief. 15. The Clerk of the Court shall reassign this case to a district judge. Upon reassignment, the 16. undersigned recommends that the district judge dismiss the case without leave to amend 17. IT IS So ORDERED. 18. Dated: April 7. 2025 19. Alex G. Tse 20. United States Magistrate Judge 21. 22. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FOR A WAIVER OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY 23. According to the Vietnam War is masterminded by the United States Congress that has not 24. only abused power to bully a weak Vietnam ally of the United States of America but also 25. expressed the great powerful America without having respected loyalty, just cause, and justice 26.which is why the Article Third (1)(2)(3)of the United States Constitution says that has taken place to 27.CLAIMS & DISPUTE RESOLUTION - Agreement relating to mutual waiver of government claims 28. for damages to government property and for injury or death of member of armed services. 1. Exchange of notes at Saigon February 9, 1965. Entered into force February 9, 1965. 16 UST 140; 2. TIAS 5773; 542 UNTS 175. That is why the United States has become to treasonous ally when section 3. (3) said: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in 4. adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort: No person shall be convicted of Treason 5. unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same over Act, or on Confession in open Court. 6. The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason 7. shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the life of the Person attainted. 8. Let plaintiff carry out 1749. Comparison of perjury Statutes --18 U.S.C. §§1621 And 1623 which is why the American leaders haven’t enforced their indigenous law and constitution to let them have 10. become to treasonous leaders. In fact, the United States has not only approved sovereign 11. Vietnam by a bilateral treaty on April 4, 1961, by 12 UST 310; TIAS 4717; 405 UNTS 77but also that 12. is why the US has not only sold Vietnam to socialism but also betrayed the Vietnam Armed Forces? 13. Because four multilateral and thirty-seven bilateral treaties of the United States solemnly signed 14. with the sovereignty of Vietnam which are less valued more than toilet paper which is why the claim & 15.dispute resolution didn’t have validity of the waiver of sovereign immunity of the United States- 16. However, the waiver of sovereign immunity is super valued by the Vietnamese people and Armed 17. Forces. Let us sue the United States because the United States is the defendant from 28 USC§ §1346 18._ 1346b the United States as defendant-June 25, 1948-Chapter 171 Tort Claims Procedure. 19. Let plaintiff prove a few American leaders when they have self-confessed wrongly acts in the Vietnam 20. by the written law without having forced to testify them. 21. First, the Vietnam War was released by the United States which exposed to the public worldwide. 22. The Pentagon Papers- The Secrets and Lies of the Vietnam War, Exposed in One Epic Document 23. With the Pentagon Papers revelations, the U.S. public’s trust in the government was forever 24. diminished by Elizabeth Becker Writer says, “A popular uprising in South Vietnam, led by Buddhist 25. clerics, followed. Fearful of losing power as well, South Vietnamese generals secretly received 26. American approval to overthrow Diem. Despite official denials, U.S. officials were deeply involved. 27“Beginning in August of 1963, we variously authorized, sanctioned and encouraged the coup efforts” 28. the Pentagon Papers revealed. “We maintained clandestine contact with them throughout the planning 1. and execution of the coup and sought to review their operational plans.” 2. The coup ended with Diem’s killing and a deepening of American involvement in the war. As the 3. authors of the papers concluded, “Our complicity in his overthrow heightened our responsibilities and 4. our commitment.” 5. Three weeks later, President Kennedy was assassinated, and the Vietnam issue fell to President 6. Johnson. 7. Second, see President Kennedy has self-confessed when he has ordered assassination President 8. Ngo Dinh Diem, (Boston (November 24) The Kennedy library has released 37 hours tape) President 9. Kennedy has self-confessed and said, “The disclosure marks the largest single release ever of 10. Kennedy recordings and offers important new insights into the president's reaction to 11. unraveling events in Vietnam not long before his death. On one tape recorded November 4, 1963, 12. Kennedy dictates a memo seeming to regret the assassination of South Vietnam's President 13. Ngo Dinh Diem, following a coup Kennedy endorsed. 14. Third, why did President Johnson have the right to sell to the sovereignty’s Vietnam to socialism? 15. Please see to opinion Johnson- Westmoreland the selling Vietnam, when President Johnson has 16. recalled General Westmoreland from Vietnam battle to Washington DC, let him testify hearings 17. before the U.S Congress. He has spoken, “A war of both invasion and subversion www.nytimes.com › 18. 2017/05/09 › Author Gregory Daddis- “opinionJohnson, Westmoreland and the 23.‘Selling’ of Vietnam” 19. Abstract "Ever an eye on domestic political trends, the president responded that spring by starting what 20. would become a yearlong campaign to not only “sell” his Southeast Asia policy, but also disprove 21. accusations of a stalemated war in Vietnam. Johnson began this publicity drive in April by bringing the 22. head of the Military Assistance Command, Vietnam, Gen. William Westmoreland, to report on the war’s 23. progress. It was the first time in American history a president had called back a wartime field commander 24. to testify on the administration’s behalf." Why does President Johnson create Salesmanship Campaign of 25. the sovereign Vietnam? 26. Fourth, Why has President Nixon threatened to cut off a head of President Nguyen Van Thieu if he 27. didn’t approve the Paris Peace Accords? And what was a waiver of sovereignty immunity of a bilateral 28. treaty of the American Ambassadors doing in the Republic of Vietnam? Why has President Nixon 1. abused power to bully a close Vietnam ally? What have the President Nixon, Secretary of State Kissing 2. and two United States senators together to cut off a head of President Nguyen Van Thieu during a 3. waiver of sovereignty immunity without having recorded this? 4. ( See https://millercenter.com › ... › cut-off-his-thieu-s-head) 5. Fifth, why has secretary of State Kissinger not enforced his Paris Peace Accords but he sold Vietnam 6. to mainland China? When Secretary of State Kissinger stated that “Vietnam failures we did to 7. ourselves.” And he openly declared, “The Vietnam War required us to emphasize the national interest 8. rather than abstract principles. What President Nixon and I tried to do was unnatural. And that is why 9. we didn't make it. Henry A. Kissinger. 10. As a result, 43rd President of the United States: 2001 ‐ 2009, Interview with Bill O'Reilly of 11. Fox News' "The O'Reilly Factor" on September 27, 2004, 12. O'REILLY: OK. First of all, I want to thank you for talking with me, since so few people will. 13. THE PRESIDENT: Well, it's a big gamble on my part. 14. O'REILLY: No, it isn't, not really though. You, we talked four and a half years ago... 15. THE PRESIDENT: I'm teasing 16. O'REILLY: Yes, when you... 17. THE PRESIDENT: I enjoy how you interview people, and I appreciate you giving me the chance to come 18. on and have, what we say in Texas, "Just a visit." 19. THE PRESIDENT: Yes. 20. O'REILLY: ... and these guys are threatening them? 21. THE PRESIDENT: That's when you're supposed to vote. You've got to stand tough with these terrorists. 22. You cannot allow the terrorists to dictate whether or not a society can be free or not. 23. Do you remember what happened in Afghanistan when the Taliban pulled the four women off the bus and 24. killed them because they had voter registration cards? I think there had been about 3 million Afghan 25. citizens who had registered at this point in time. A lot of people said: Well, the elections look like they've 26. got to be over in Afghanistan, because the Taliban is, too violent to allow the elections to go forward. 27. Today 10 million citizens in that country have registered to vote, forty percent of whom are women, which 28. is a powerful statistic. 1. O'REILLY: The South Vietnamese didn't fight for their freedom, which is why they don't have it 2. today. 3. THE PRESIDENT H: Yes. 4. O'REILLY: Do you think the Iraqis are going to fight for their freedom? 5. THE PRESIDENT: Absolutely. 6. The plaintiff has reported the those important reasons that have risen a waiver of sovereign immunity which 7. the American Ambassador has signed with the Republic of Vietnam to be unvalued international law. 8. Because this bilateral treaty is illegal law, the United States has abused power a bully a weak 9. sovereign Vietnam to follow behind of the American leg. Just because both sovereign nations are equal each 10. other without having had the greatest power’s America that trampled down the weakest nation which is why 11. the United States enacted law to Vietnam while the Congress of the Republic of Vietnam couldn’t ratify, but 12. the United States quickly forced Vietnam to carry out it. In fact, in the United States will have issued a small 13. or big thing matter which relates to the national fate, so the United States Congress shall be passed or 14. didn’t pass it by the United States Congress which is why a small national congress hasn’t had any rights 15. to revote when the smallest congress should be agreement to the foreign act relating to the small nation. 16. Let the plaintiff be recommendations the claims and dispute resolution agreement’s a bilateral treaty to 17. the Court when the American Ambassador signed with the sovereign Vietnam on April 4, 1961, by 12 18. UST 310; TIAS 4717; 405 UNTS 77 without having unvalued by the indigenous law. Because 19. these powerful American leader have been distorted their indigenous laws and constitution, let them 20. express their belligerents more than their respectfulness peace, loyalty and justice themselves. Why have 21. they prejudiced their law and constitution without having cared to naturalized refugees and the foreign 22. humans? In contrast, they have strongly used the indigenous laws and constitution to rule them when the 23. foreign humans haven’t had protection by the indigenous laws and Constitution because the Fourteenth 24. Amendment declared and ratified July 9, 1868, “Section 1. stated that “ All persons born or naturalized 25. in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State 26. wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities 27. of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without 28. due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law. 1. Let the Plaintiff point out that the Fourteenth Amendment that the United States has never protected 2. for anyone who lived in the foreign nations which is why the United States has been invaded and 3. subverted them to deprive the right of life to them. Next, the foreign citizens had not voted for the 4. American general national elections and the United States Congress, that is why the United States 5. Congress has been enacting the law to force the foreign governments that they have not only 6. surrendered to the law of the United States without having refused the indigenous laws and bullied 7. treaties, but oppressed them by the power of the United States. Finally, the authority of the United 8. States has forced the foreign governments without having surrendered any American treaties but the 9. authority of the United States has freely torn the foreign treaties without having being know 10. beforehand – even though, the United States has not approved by the United States law, nor ratify the 11. treaties. Ironically, why has the American Central Intelligence of Agency had authorized to 12. monopolize into inner of the foreign governments without having respected their sacred sovereign 13. nations while the United States has thought them to be Neo-colonialists of the great powerful America. 14. Let the Plaintiff enforce 28 U.S.C. 2074- Rules of procedure and evidence: submission to Congress; 15. effective day. In fact, The conspiracy case of the US Central intelligence of agency in Saigon should 16. be killed General Nguyen Ngoc Loan? (Morning of May 7, 1968, at Tan Cang bridge) 17. "April, 1968, Advisor to the Republic of Vietnam’s National Police, J. Accompura (former colonel of 18. the United States Army) was invited to meet the new CIA Station Chief at VNCH, Mr. George Weisz, 19. to replace Mr. Jorgensen. Not submissive, Mr. Weisz gives Accompura good: "The Chinese 20. government decides to target the General Director of Police of Vietnam Department Vietnam Bureau 21. Police (QGVN,) Major General Nguyen Ngoc Loan". 22. Why? 23. Because: "Since February 1967, the American Embassy in Saigon has had preliminary contacts with 24. some low-level the National Front for the Liberation of South Vietnam (MTGPMN) officials (... ) 25. Later, the American intelligence community in Vietnam shook hands with important figures of the R 26. Bureau (Central Southern Bureau) and MTGPMN such as: Mr. Nguyen Huu Tho, Mrs.Nguyen Thi 27. Binh, Duong Mrs. Quynh Hoa, Mr.Tran Van Tra, Mr. Dong Van Cong, Mr. Tran Buu Kiem and 28. Mr.Tran Bach Dang, Director of Bureau R. 1. (...) All of the above-mentioned "night walk" contacts did not pass the eye of General Loan, the Director 2. General of the National Police. General Loan ordered S-6 (Special Police) to detain some (MTGPMN) 3. characters while he was at the US Embassy Security at the "safe houses" (safe houses) in the outskirts of 4. Saigon DC and Tay Ninh Province ... 5. (...) 6. A conspiracy of the assassin executing General Loan's death sentence is a Vietnamese-married Marine 7. Corps (TQLC) officer, who works for CIA Saigon. General Loan's stealth gun is an M-16 with 8. binoculars. 5.56 mm Flechette M-16 bullet... 9. This kind of bullet has the ability to penetrate through the armor, but because the shooter shoots from the 10. Helicopter, when pulling the trigger, there is a little movement, it only crushes the General's foot tube. 11. The result is that General Loan discharged, the Director General of the National Police lost his position, 12. as well as General Le Nguyen Khang lost his position as the commander of the Capital Region, and the 13. Commander of the Third Army, General Literature (shot down by an American helicopter) lost his 14. position Saigon chief Big Market. Prime Minister Nguyen Van Loc must also resign... 15. According to Chu Viet - 5/2012 16. Please see TULLIUS ACAMPORA Obituary (1918 - 2014) - Legacy.com 17. Nov 8, 2014 • ACAMPORA, Tullius Alexander 6 October 1918 - 4 November 2014. Tullius Alexander 18. "Tully" Acampora passed away peacefully in Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts on … 19. Next, the Plaintiff’s Bright Quang has carried out 1 U.S. Code § 112a - United States Treaties and Other 20. International Agreements; contents; admissibility in evidence- (Added Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1001, § 2, 21. 64 Stat. 980; amended Pub. L. 103–236, title I, § 138, Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 397; Pub. L. 108–458 22. , title VII, § 7121(a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3807; Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LIX, § 5947(b), Dec. 23. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3482.) 24. In fact, 28 USC§§ 2072(a)(b)(c)_2073(b) - Rules of procedure and evidence; method of prescribing 25. That the Government solemnly promised to protect the South-East-Asia including Cambodia, 26. Laos and South Vietnam. (The Republic of Vietnam.) So, the US Congress has approved 22 US 27. C §§ 1571_1604. P.L 329, 81st Congresses – 63 Stat- 714- December 23, 1950, which is why this written 28. law has become to unjust law while the United States Congress has not only approved it but also enacted 1. it to be indigenous American law. But that is why the United States has sold three national allies to 2. mainland China – such as the Southeast organization, Geneva Conference, and Paris Peace Accords 3. Treaties have not enacted the law by the United States Congress when 1 US. Code 112a United States 4. Treaty has ordered them. Even worse, why have the thirty-seven bilateral treaties of the American 5. Ambassador signed with the sovereignty of Vietnam not enacted law by the United States Congress? 6. On the other hand, a United States Senator Wayne Morse is one of member’s Committee on 7 7. Foreign Affairs who has self-testified before hearing his congress on April 5, 8, and 9. and 10, 8. 1963, the United States Congress enacted H.R. 7885 Public law 88-205 Approved December 9. 16, 1963, 11. Am- Let Congress allow president Kennedy sent 400 America Armed Forces 10. to the highland of Vietnam on the day when Section 407 has ordered and said, “ No 11. department, agency, officer, or employee of the US shall, under authority of this Act, exercise 12. any direction, supervision, or control over, or impose any requirements or conditions with respect 13. to, the personnel, curriculum, methods of instruction, or administration of any educational 14. institution. Approved Dec. 16, 1963, 11 a.m. Just because, the modern civilized and 15. progressive America has been taken the American income taxes to buy off the Sovereignty of 16. the Republic of Vietnam, the Vietnamese people, and troops to let America play a war game 17. in the Republic of Vietnam in order to deprive the rights to life of the Vietnamese people and 18. troops. In the meanwhile, the American leaders of belligerents live on the fat of the land to 19. interestingly enjoy the deaths of the weakest and the poorest Vietnamese people sunk into 20. the American bombs and bullets' sea that's so-called a waiver of sovereign immunity of the 21. great powerful America. For example, General Westmoreland has testified before the U.S 22. Congress when he said: At Westmoreland’s first stop, The Associated Press’s annual editors’ 23. luncheon on April 25, the general argued that Vietnam’s fate would affect the future of all 24. “emerging nations.” He lauded his soldiers’ performance in rescuing a Saigon government “on 25. the verge of defeat,” while highlighting the complexities of this kind of war — “a war of both 26. subversion and invasion, a war in which political and psychological factors are of such 27. as consequence.” And while a confident Westmoreland painted a favorable military picture, he 28. twice emphasized a point that most likely made Johnson wince. “I do not see any end of the 1. war in sight.” That is why in the United States Senator Joe Biden has stated, " I am ready to vote 2. any money needed to bring American soldiers, Americans out of South Vietnam back to the 3. United States, but I will not give a penny for evacuation and resettlement of any person. Viet yet, 4. the United States have no responsibility to save any one person or 100,001 Vietnamese, the 5. United States has no responsibility to them. The victory of Vietnamese Communist was because 6. they [the Vietnamese] refused to fight anti-communism, that is why the United States Congress 7. pretends blindness and stone-deaf during the four multilateral and the thirty-seven bilateral 8. treaties have solemnly signed with the Republic of Vietnam - while Secretary of State Kissinger 9. has self-confessed and stated, " The Vietnam War required us to emphasize the national interest 10. rather than abstract principle. What President Nixon and I tried to do was unnatural. And that is 11. why we didn't make it." Since, two United States Senators are Barry M. Goldwater, R. Arizona, 12. and John C. Stennis, D- Mississippi that are together with Secretary of State Kissinger strongly 13. support for President Nixon. let them cut off His[Thieu's] Head- on Jan. 20, 1973- time 09:32- 14. Conversation number: 036-021 that is a waiver of sovereign immunity by a bilateral treaty has 15. forced the Republic of Vietnam to sign which is why the Paris Peace Accords is a waiver of 16. sovereign immunity too. What does the Court have carried out the four international treaties of the 17. Vietnam war and the thirty-even treaties of the American Ambassador to sign in Vietnam, but the 18. court carried a claims & dispute resolution when the United States has trafficked Vietnamese to 19. socialism? Why have the four multilateral and the thirty-seven bilateral treaties not valued less 20. than bilateral treaty's 16 UST 140; TIAS 5773; 542 UNTS 175? That is why the great powerful 21. America didn’t enforce any United States treaties in the Vietnam- therefore, the United States has not only 22. cheated Vietnam in order to sell Vietnam to socialism but also used the powerful American to let the United 23. States has trafficked Vietnamese people to mainland China. Let the United States protect the core of 24. national interests which is why H.R. 7885 Public law 88-205 Approved December 16, 1963, that has 25. entirely ordered the American employees that they enforced this Act to fight against Communism in 26. Vietnam during the United States Attorney General Robert Kennedy came to Saigon, he has not only 27. persuaded Vietnam but also stated that Vietnam must have won communism. But he didn’t have suggested 28. any his American Armed Forces to violate criminal war like My-Lai martial case which looked like 1.Famous Trials https://famous-trials.com › mylaicourts. My Lai Courts Martial (1970-FamousnTrial 2.just because, that’s time was taken place in war without having restored peace. Therefore, the American martial 3. Court seemed not expressed to any compensations case to the civil Vietnamese innocent people were the 4.war victims. So, great significance of a bilateral treaty is16 UST 140; TIAS 5773; 542 UNTS 175. That’s 5. in case of a waiver of sovereign immunity should understand that take place in the war time without have 6.took place in the peace time, because the peace time the America Armed Forces did not operate on the Vietnam 7.battles, while, the America Armed Forces had gradually withdrawn from the Vietnam battle in the first 1973 8.when the Paris Peace Accords was signed by the four parties. The United States has self-decided the 9. Vietnamization when President Nixon has secretly began to tear almost all of the United States treaties with 10. sovereign Vietnam. Even worse, mutual defense assistance was signed by the United States, France, 11. Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia. This agreement, known as the pentalateral agreement, facilitated the transfer 12. of American military aid to the French War effort in Indochina. The agreement's purpose was to provide a 13. framework for the United States to support the French Union's efforts in maintaining security in the region 14.while the US Secretary of State submitted this treaty to its Congress; it then enacted 22 U.S.C§ §1571_ 1604. 15. Public Law 329-81st Congress Stat 714. December 23, 1950. That is why the Geneva Conference in July 16.1954, while the United States has entirely sponsored it, but the United States Congress didn't enact a law by 1 17. USC §112a concerns United States treaties and international agreements. Specifically, it outlines the 18.responsibilities of the secretary of State to compile, edit, index, and publish these agreements. The 19. compilation includes all treaties the United States is a party to and international agreements other than 20.treaties. Additionally, it establishes the admissibility of these compiled agreements in legal proceedings. That 21.is why the US Secretary of States didn't submit the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) to the US 22.Congress. Let Congress enact the law like Mutual Defense Assistance, also known as the Southeast Asia 23.Collective Defense Treaty, was a military alliance formed in 1954 to counter communist expansion in the 24. region. It included the United States, France, Great Britain, New Zealand, Australia, the Philippines, 26. Thailand, and Pakistan, only two Southeast Asian countries joined in, but France, Great Britain, and 27. Pakistan didn't send their troops to Vietnam, other memberships had been withdrawing their troops 28 in Vietnam by the first 1973, and America Armed Forces too. So, the great significance of a bilateral treaty 1. is16 UST 140; TIAS 5773; 542 UNTS 175 of the American Ambassador forced to sovereign Vietnam signed 2. on it to let the United States is defeating communism without having secretly supported to communist enemy 3.by the Article III of the United States Constitution ordered. Understanding of international relations protocol 4.has issued the law to each other; both national Congresses ought to approve it, if one side disagreed with this 5.law, so international relations protocol was illegal actions. That is why the United States didn't express any 6.international relations protocols with sovereign Vietnam in the war time. Specifically, the Vietnam War, 7.sovereign Vietnam, and the entire treaties were a monopoly absolute decision by the great powerful 8.America without having respected the right of self-determination of the Vietnamese people and its closely 9.allied Vietnam. To include entire treaties from the first to the end the Paris Peace Accords and bilateral treaties 10.have been masterminded by the United States. Ironically, before the United States sold Vietnam to 11.mainland China, the American Ambassador had strongly forced Vietnam to sign a bilateral treaty on 12.September 3 and October14, 1974, as an agreement relating to the transfer of scrap to Vietnam as 13.supplementary military assistance. Exchange of notes at Saigon November 8 and December 14, 1972. 23 UST 14.4263; TIAS 7534. Amended September 3, and October 14, 1974. (25 UST 5419; 488 UNTS 270.) So, let him 14.analyze this bilateral treaty which is why the United States has used its invasion and subversion war to letting 16.the United States betray and destroy a weak people to paupers without having seen any sunrise of modern 17.civilization age at the end of horizon, but in the end of the invasion war of the United States has evilly played 18.a game of hoaxes. In the meanwhile, Soviet Union and mainland China were secretly supporting their super 19. weapons like S300 milesto North Vietnam- but the United States has not only cut foreign assistance financial 20. aid for Vietnam before the United States Armed Forces were gradually withdrawing from Vietnam but also 21. torn the Paris Peace Accords during the United States has supplied military assistance as the scraps which is 22.why the Vietnam Armed Forces somehow fights to defeat international communism from the United States 23.Congress has been requested us- on the other hand, the nationally people and leaders didn't give ear to the 24 great powerful America, so the United States has not only respected sovereign Vietnam by an American 25.bilateral treaty but also ordered the United States Central intelligence of Agency that it had secretly 26.assassinated the famous leader Ngo Dinh Diem and his excellent Generals when the Vietnamese communist 27.troops haven't spent any little blood to fight them. Moreover, during the coup and assassination leader Ngo 28.Dinh Diem, the United States has helped North Vietnam that it was seizing for more than 70% low 1.governments while the North Vietnam regime did not spend any drop by drop blood. Ironically, what is 2.the United States meaning to mobilize Vietnam to defeat communism? Where does the Freedom of Thought of 3.the United States express clearly? When has the United States secretly worshipped the waste-matter socialism 4.to impress Diversity, Equality, and in conclusion? 5. As a result, his final recommendation would point out a waiver of sovereign immunity of the United States in 6. the Vietnam War that is why one side of the United States has secretly been opening green light, let the 7. United States welcomed the North Vietnam enemy while the United States doesn't enforce the Paris Peace 8. Accords which is why the masterminds of the United States express the disloyalty, unjust cause, injustice 9. with its Vietnam allied. Next, when the United States Congress enacted the law to invade Vietnam and distort 10.the United States Constitution when both nations have privately owned land- in the meantime, Vietnam 11. didn't have terrorized the United States. That is why the United States has tenderly been seducing for the 12. Vietnamese people and government of Vietnam. Let them entirely fight against communists during a 13.Vietnamese patriotic leader's Ngo Dinh Diem seemed not to have interesting foreign policy of the United 14.States, so the United States has not only assassinated him but also been coupling his regime to build social 15.chaos. The United States has thought Vietnam to be a neo-colonialist of the United States without having 16.respected equal justice with each other. The frauds of the United States have expressed contradictions 17.in Vietnam to self-adored chauvinism. The first goal of the United States had seduced Vietnam to defeat 18.ideological communism while the United States had worshiped it. The second goal of the United States has 19.self-revealed the unkind face, let the United States have not only seized Vietnam, but also betrayed Vietnam, 20. and third goal of the United States has been consumed the because the expirations’ weapons of the United 21.States were directly of World War II and then, support to Vietnam consumed them, which is why the United 22. States sold Vietnam to mainland China while Vietnam used the expired weapons to transfer to Vietnam- 23. whether somehow could Vietnam been fight communist to win like the United States Attorney General has 24.mobilized Vietnam to win communism. Finally, the high super values of the United States are respected all 25. of the laws, treaties, and constitution when the United States should be self-respected oneself, that meant 26. that the United States shouldn't have abused power to deceive any small weakest nations aliens when they 27.are together adored one goal with the United States because a great powerful America has self-had against its 28. alliances in one time that should be bad impacted to the worldwide as “difficult to have name easy to 1. squander”. Because the great powerful America shall not live for the long run such as we have seen so many 2. great powerful nations in the past. They had been perished by the law of Heaven and Earth- therefore, we, the 3. human beings, will not have bad treat from tribunal of human conscience to each other, but we must express 4. the true truth each other because truth is understood oneself without having described, and explained, when 5. truth has stayed in heart. Finally, a waiver of sovereign immunity of the United States has had high dignity 6. when the war has taken place on time, the peace time in Vietnam has disvalued a waiver of sovereign 7. immunity of the United States because the United States has directly self- oppressed Vietnam to approve the 8. Paris Peace Accords from January 27, 1973, during the Vietnamese American enslaver war has taken place 9. on April 30, 1975. Otherwise, all of the United States treaties have been signed with the Republic of Vietnam 10. in war time or so-called from 1950 to 1974, therefore, the waiver of sovereign immunity of the Vietnam had 11. no longer valued, or so-called the total treaties of the United States have solemnly been signed with Vietnam 12. which were four multilateral and the thirty-seven bilateral treaties when all of them were self-torn by the 13.United States already which is why a waiver of sovereign immunity has counted quality of the peace time 14.that is wrongful actions. With no conditionally Paris Peace Accords had no articles and Chapters ordered to 15.detain, nationalize, and confiscate four parties related in the Vietnam War which is why the Court has 16. expressed validly in the peace time. While all of the United States treaties were torn, one of all treaties had 17.disvalued the counted waiver of sovereign immunity to be nothing. 18. In case of a waiver and sovereign immunity should understand about to take place in the wartime without 19.have took place in the peace time because the peace time has not operated on the Vietnam battles by the 20. America Armed Forces. So, great significance of a bilateral treaty is16 UST 140; TIAS 5773; 542 UNTS 21.175 of the American Ambassador forced to sovereign Vietnam signed on it to let the United States defeat 22. Communism in the Sovereign Vietnam. But in the meanwhile, the United States has self-changed the white 23. to the black color. Therefore, all of the United States treaties signed with the Republic of Vietnam had 24. enforced perfectly, but all of the United States treaties didn’t have law enforcement, they didn’t have 25. valued jurisdiction. That is why the United States enacted 22 UCSC § 1645b. Receipt and determination of 26.claims; notice by publication in Federal Register. According to this 22 UCSC§ 1465b that the United States 27.Congress has acknowledged the Properties of the Vietnamese American citizen which were nationalized by 28.current Vietnam after April 30, 1975 that have legal. So, a waiver of sovereign immunity of the United States 1. has no longer valued jurisdiction. (May. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title VII, § 703, as added Pub. L. 96–606, 2. 22 U.S. Code § 1645c - Ownership of claims by nationals 3. A claim may be favorably considered under section 1645b of this title only if the property right on which it is 4. based was owned, wholly or partially, directly or indirectly, by a national of the United States on the date of 5. loss and only to the extent that the claim has been held by one or more nationals of the United States 6. continuously from the date that the loss occurred until the date of filing with the Commission. 7. 22 U.S. Code § 1645d - Claims based on ownership interest in or debt or other obligation owing by 8. corporations or other legal entities 9. (a)Nationals of United States; charge on property 10. A claim under section 1645b of this title based upon an ownership interest in any corporation, association, or 11. other entity which is a national of the United States may not be considered. A claim under section 1645b of 12. this title based upon a debt or other obligation owing by any corporation, association, or other entity 13. organized under the laws of the United States, or of any State, the District of Columbia, or the 14. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico may be considered only if such debt or other obligation is a charge on 15. property which has been nationalized, expropriated, or otherwise taken by Vietnam. 16. (b)Direct ownership 17. A claim under section 1645b of this title based upon a direct ownership interest in a corporation, association 18. , or other entity may be considered, subject to the other provisions of this subchapter, if such corporation, 19. association, or other entity on the date of the loss was not a national of the United States, without regard to 20. the per centum of ownership vested in the claimant. 21. 22 U.S. Code § 1645e - Offsets 22. n determining the amount of any claim under this subchapter, the Commission shall deduct all amounts the 23. I claimant has received from any source on account of the same loss or losses for which the claim is filed. 24. (Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title VII, § 706, as added Pub. L. 96–606, Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3536.) 25. 22 U.S. Code § 1645f - Certifications; assigned claims 26. (a)The Commission shall certify to each claimant who files a claim under this subchapter the amount 27. determined by the Commission to be the loss suffered by the claimant which is covered by this subchapter. 28. The Commission shall certify to the Secretary of State such amount and the basic information underlying that 1. amount, together with a statement of the evidence relied upon and the reasoning employed in making that 2. determination. 3. (b)In any case in which a claim under this subchapter is assigned by purchase before the Commission 4. determines the amount due on that claim, the amount so determined shall not exceed the amount of actual 5. consideration paid by the last such assignee. 6. (Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title VII, § 707, as added Pub. L. 96–606, Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3536.) 7. 22 U.S. Code § 1645g - Consolidated awards 8. With respect to any claim under section 1645b of this title which, at the time of the award, is vested in 9. persons other than the person by whom the original loss was sustained, the Commission shall issue a 10. consolidated award in favor of all claimants then entitled to the award, which award shall indicate the 11. respective interests of such claimants in the award, and all such claimants shall participate, in proportion to 12. their indicated interests, in any payments that may be made under this subchapter in all respects as if the 13. award had been in favor of a single person. 14. (Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title VII, § 708, as added Pub. L. 96–606, Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3536.) 15. 22 U.S. Code § 1645h - Claims Fund; establishment; deductions 16. (a)The Secretary of the Treasury may establish in the Treasury of the United States the Claims Fund for the 17. payment of unsatisfied claims of nationals of the United States against Vietnam, as authorized by this 18. subchapter. 19. (b)The Secretary of the Treasury shall deduct from any amounts covered into the Claims Fund an amount 20. equal to 5 per centum thereof as reimbursement to the Government of the United States for expenses 21. incurred by the Commission and by the Treasury Department in the administration of this subchapter. The o 22. amounts sdeducted shall be covered into the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts. 23. (Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title VII, § 709, as added Pub. L. 96–606, Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3536.) 24. 22 U.S. Code § 1645i - Award payment procedures 25. (a)Certification of amounts 26. The Commission shall certify to the Secretary of the Treasury, in terms of United States currency, each 27. award made pursuant to section 1645b of this title. 28. (b)Priority of payments 1.(1)Upon certification of each award made pursuant to section 1645b of this title, the Secretary of the Treasury 2. shall, out of the sums covered into the Claims Fund, make payments on account of such awards as follows, 3. and in the following order of priority: 4. (A)Payment in the amount of $2,500 or the principal amount of the award, whichever is less. 5. (B)Thereafter, payments from time to time, in ratable proportions, on account of the unpaid balance of the 6. principal amounts of all awards according to the proportions which the unpaid balance of such awards bear to 7. the total amount in the Claims Fund available for distribution at the time such payments are made. 8. (2)After payment has been made in full of the principal amounts of all awards pursuant to paragraph (1), pro 9. rata payments may be made on account of any interest that may be allowed on such awards. 10. (c)Regulations 11. Payments or applications for payments under subsection (b) shall be made in accordance with such 12. (Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title VII, § 710, as added Pub. L. 96–606, Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3537.) 13. regulations as the Secretary of the Treasury may prescribe. 14. 22 U.S. Code § 1645j - Settlement period 15. The Commission shall complete its affairs in connection with the settlement of claims pursuant to this 16. subchapter not later than three years after the final date for the filing of claims as provided in section 1645b 17. of this title. 18. (Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title VII, § 711, as added Pub. L. 96–606, Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3537.) 19. 22 U.S. Code § 1645k - Transfer of records 20. The Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Defense shall transfer or otherwise 21. make available to the Commission such records and documents relating to claims authorized by this 22. subchapter as may be required by the Commission in carrying out its functions under this subchapter. 23. (Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title VII, § 712, as added Pub. L. 96–606, Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3537.) 24. 22 U.S. Code § 1645l - Authorization of appropriations 25. There are authorized to be appropriated for any fiscal year beginning on or after October 1, 1980, such sums 26. as may be necessary to enable the Commission and the Treasury Department to pay their respective 27. administrative expenses incurred in carrying out their functions under this subchapter. Amounts appropriated 28. under this section may remain available until expended. 1. (Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title VII, § 713, as added Pub. L. 96–606, Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3537.) 2. 22 U.S. Code § 1645m - Fees for services; limitation; penalty 3. No remuneration on account of services rendered on behalf of any claimant, in connection with any claim 4. filed with the Commission under this subchapter, shall exceed 10 per centum of the total amount paid 5. pursuant to any award certified under the provisions of this subchapter on account of such claim. Any 6. agreement to the contrary shall be unlawful and void. Whoever, in the United States or elsewhere, demands 7. or receives, on account of services so rendered, any remuneration in excess of the maximum permitted by this 8. section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $5,000 or 9. imprisoned not more than twelve months, or both. 10. (Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title VII, § 714, as added Pub. L. 96–606, Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3537.) 11. 22 U.S. Code § 1645n - Applicability of other statutory provisions 12. (a)To the extent they are not inconsistent with the provisions of this subchapter, the following provisions of 13. subchapter I of this chapter shall be applicable to this subchapter; subsections (b), (c), (d), (e), and (h) of 14. section 1623 of this title and subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f) of section 1626 of this title. Any reference in 15. such provisions to “this subchapter” shall be deemed to be a reference to those provisions and to this 16. subchapter. 17. (b)Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter and in those provisions of subchapter I referred to in 18. subsection (a), the Commission shall comply with the provisions of subchapter II of chapter 5, and the 19. provisions of chapter 7, of title 5. 20. (Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title VII, § 715, as added Pub. L. 96–606, Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3538.) 21. 22 U.S. Code § 1645o - Separability 22. If any provision of this subchapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, 23. the remainder of this subchapter or the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall 24. not be affected. 25. (Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title VII, § 716, as added Pub. L. 96–606, Dec. 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 3538.) 26. CONCLUSION 27. For the foregoing real reasons, the petitioner respectfully requests that the U.S. District Court Northern 28. District of California give an order for granting the compensation benefits suitable with statute of the US of 1. America the Vietnam War. 2. Conclusion, I certify under Penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that foregoing 3. paragraph is true and correct. 4. 5. Respectfully yours Bright Quang Date: April 15, 2025 Citation: I have submitted to the Clerk of Court already.