Và Như Thế Đó Em . . . - Nguyễn Văn Thành - An Minh

1. Pro Se Plaintiff’s Name Bright Quang 2. Prisoner No. 25807806142 3. Institution the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 4. The Paris Peace Accords on Jan.27/1973, officially ended U.S. 5. military involvement in the Vietnam War 6. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7. NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8. 8. Pro Se Bright Quang | Cases No: 3: 24- cv- 01328-AGT 9. 9. Plaintiff | Case No: 24-cv-01328- JCS 10. V, | Case:No:24-cv- 01238 TLT 11. Party | By the Clerk of Court 12. The United States | Mask B. Busby 13. The American President | Case No: CIV: 538988 14. | Superior Court the State of California 15. | Of San Mateo 16. et al | 17. The President John F. Kennedy | Confidential Document: 18. General William Westmoreland | Case No: 532272 on June 1, 2017 19. Secretary Of State Henry Kissinger | 20. Defendants 21. et al | 22. ___________________________________ 23. PROPOSAL HEARING 24. FOR REFUND BACK AND NOTICE TO THE CLERK OF COURT 25. the Plaintiff has carried out the First Amendment and Equal Protection of the law. – 26. Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution which is why the Clerk 27. of Court has not only discriminated against a Vietnamese American litigant but also 28. prejudiced the law and the United States Constitution. While the plaintiff is pauperism 1., low neck without having had the jurisdiction to petition in this Court – 2.therefore, you have dismissed his case from the trial, even great, you ordered him to initial 3. deadline is on February 5, 2025, 19, 2025, and 26, 2025, that are why your schedules 4. haven’t carried for on times when you have self-dropped them, but you didn’t have sent 5. any notices to him, you have posted his calendar 3: 24-cv- 08512- Quang v, Kennedy et al 6.The plaintiff would like to prove 28 U.S. Code § 1915 - Proceedings in Forma pauperis 7. when you have ordered him to carry out this statutory but which is why you have ordered 8. him to pay $405.00 for the fee and this court didn’t resolve for any prisoners. When you 9. have order him to collateral property – and therefore, he has mortgaged his intellectual 10. property that have his nineteenth books, included 42 American President portraits, and 11. some statues bronze of the American Presidents, but you didn’t send any copies to him. 12. In case, you have ordered him to carry out Civil Rights Action 42 US Code§ 1983 by 13. Docket’s 24-cv-01238 JCS. Then, he would follow you when he has filed in this and paid 14. to the Court $405.00, but the cashier of the Court didn’t send any copies to him when you 15. have ordered him to follow 28 US Code 1915- Forma Pauperism in which the fee is $10. 16. without had $405.00. You have ordered him to consent 28 USC§ 636 (c), so, he has 17. consented this Court that resolved for this trail Court that within the jury people, but this 18. Court didn’t have opened judges. He’ll have appealed to other Court. 19. While he expressed Rule 9. Pleading Special Maters, but you didn’t carry out this. You 20. ordered him to change the rules 3. of civil rights procedure, because the rules 3 civil 21. rights procedure hasn’t contained any perjury while the Rules 9 civil Rights procedure has 22. expressed the United States Treaties were mistaken. Just because, he has provided the 23. Rules of Evidence like by the ALJ pursuant to §224.24 or 22 U.S.C §§ 2071_2073 24. prosecute rules of evidence because those American leaders have self-confessed 25. themselves in wrongful actions in war by their written law. 26. For those reasons above the Plaintiff has carried out 1743 Perjury Overview of 18 U.S.C 27. §§ 1621_1623 which the Paris Peace Accords has contained the 23 Articles and nine 28. Chapters which no had Article and Chapter ought to be detained any officers of four 1.parties which is why the South Vietnamese officials were detained by the Paris Peace 2. Accords because of one statutory and treaty was openly published and stated on the 3. whole world, that is why those didn’t perfectly enforce- therefore, the United States 4. Congress enacted the perjury of the law. 5. The Claims and Dispute Resolution or the bilateral treaty of the United States was signed 6. with the sovereignty of the Republic of Vietnam that agreement relating to mutual waiver 7. of government claims for damages to government property and injury or death of 8. members of armed services. Exchange of notes at Saigon February 9, 1965, Entered into 9. force February 9, 1965, by 16 UST 140; TIAS 5773;542 UNTS 175 that’s meant 10. national immunity, but it hasn’t had the national immunity for any prisoners of war. 11. Hence, both of governments were violated prisoners of war that government has had duty 12. and responsibility compensation in one party. Otherwise, this contract has super valued in 13. the war time - however, the national immunity doesn’t have value in peace time- 14. accordingly, the America Armed Forces have withdrawn out of Sovereign Vietnam after 15. six days of the Paris Peace Accords signed on January 27, 1973. And after twenty years 16. have gone by, the United States came back to the Socialist Republic of Vietnam to make 17. relationship while the South Vietnam Armed Forces were detaining for the nation 18. immunity of the United States treaty during this a bilateral treaty is voided by peace time 19. because the final decision of the Paris Peace Accords has resolved everything in the 20. Vietnam War, including the sovereignty of Vietnam and the right to self-determination of 21. the Vietnamese people, and nationalization properties of each party while four parties, 22. without having arrested any soldiers of one party and having national immunity from 23. deaths, injuries, not deprived of the right to life of any membership in the four nations in 24. the Paris Peace Accords, which is why the sovereignty of the Republic of Vietnam was 25. lost by the Paris Peace Accords - that is why United States Department of State- Treaties 26. in Force a list of Treaties and other International Agreements of the United States in force 27. on January 1, 2020. Therefore, you didn’t express the waiver of national immunity upon 28. such as his civil Rights Procedure. Therefore, the waiver of national immunity has 1. counted by the Clerk of Court isn’t had valued in his lawsuit. In fact, the Paris Peace 2. Accords has ended war on January 27, 1973 which is why the United States has detained 3. him on April 30, 1975, because a United States Congress Senator Joe Biden openly stated 4. and spoken, “America has no obligation with any South Vietnamese soldiers on April 5. 30, 1975, during Senator Joe Biden has forgotten on his H.R. 7885 Public Law-88-205 6. on section 407, Senator Joe Biden and his Congress have not been voted for evacuating 7. the Vietnamese soldiers and people to the United States. (See to his books Justice for 8. Vietnam- page 516 by Page Publishing Company- ISBN: 978-4-6624-6387-7 by his 9. intellectual Property was mortgaged for the Court). On the other hand, if the legal 10. invasion war of the United States has taken place the right of the United States 11. Constitution, so the United States Congress didn’t have enacted 22 Review –The 12. Vietnam War Flashcard from 22 USC § 1645 to B, C and to 22 USC§ 1645(0)- 13. Especial matters of the Vietnam War have been risen to (a) to the extent they are not 14. inconsistent with the provision of this subchapter, the following provisions of subchapter 15. I of this chapter shall be applicable to this subchapter; subsections (b),(c), (d), (e) and (h) 16. of section 1623 of this title and subsections (c), (d), and (f) of 1626 of this title. Any 17. reference in such provisions to “this subchapter" shall be deemed to be a reference to 18. those provisions and to this subchapter. 19. (b) Except as otherwise in this subchapter and those provisions of subchapter I referred 20. to in subsection (a), the Commission shall comply with the provisions of subchapter II of 21. Chapter 5, and the provisions of Chapter 7, of Title 5. To the Congress has ordered by 22. those chapters- therefore, the plaintiff ought to prove the rules of Evidence and the Rules 23. of perjury because the United States has solemnly been signed a few treaties with the 24. Sovereignty of Vietnam which are why those were voided in the Vietnam War while 25. those the United States Treaties have openly been publishing for the written laws- In fact, 26. Bilateral Treaties in force as of January 1, 2020 for the Sovereignty of Vietnam which are 27. why the plaintiff has been enslaver in the United States without having earned any 28. pennies benefit during his sacred nation is ruled by international communists, his 1.properties were nationalized by the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and so on. On other 2. hand, if the United States has thought about the Vietnam War is legal invasion, the United 3. States Congress couldn't enact these laws after the Fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975, and 4. therefore, the United States Congress enacted subchapter ‘s 22 USC§ 1645 a-definitions- 5. the term “national of the United States means- to (5) the term “Claims fund” means 6. the special fund established in the Treasury of the United States composed of such sums 7. as may be paid to or realized by the United States pursuant to the terms of any 8. agreement setting those claims described in section 1645b of this title that may be entered 9. into between the governments of the United States and Vietnam. March 10, 1950, ch.54, 10. tile VII§ 702, as added Pub. L.96-606, December, 28, 1980, 94 Stat.3534 11. The Clerk of Court has compared for different procedures apply depending on whether 12. Quang proceeds in Forma Paupers or not. See 28 USC§ 1995; More v, Maricopa 13. Cnty.Sheriff’s Off., 657F.3d 890,892 (9 Circuit 2011(nothing that “[a] 11 person, not 14. just prisoners, may see IFP status.” According to this prisoner was different with the 15. Plaintiff’s Quang, because this guy has been anti- the United States by his own goals 16. when he has claims to the Court by Forma Paupers. However, the case of the Plaintiff’s 17. Quang has belonged of the unjust treaties of the United States to sign with the 18. sovereignty of Vietnam by the written law or so-called the rules of evidence by 22 USC§ 19. 2255 provides that “prisoners” may move for relief” on the ground that the sentence was 20. imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States, or that the Court 21. was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence, or that sentence was in excess of the 22. maximum authorized by law, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack.” Habeas Corpus 23. 2255 Motions-The law Offices of Alan. ... Alanellis.com/habeas-corpus-2255-and-2241- 24. motions/ 25. In conclusion, in his opinion that the independence of the Court is a neutral path without 26. having defended the native defendants during the Court has heavily shaken the conscious 27. of the honest plaintiff. Just because of Unmitigated Punishment for offenders, or so- 28. called." Code of Conduct for United States Judges, when the plaintiff and the defendants 1.ought to be argued before the Court, within the laws, the Constitution, and treaties, 2. and before the American Jury. Let the jury people pass a sentence for their prisoner of 3war in Vietnam, which is why the Clerk of Court has hurriedly dismissed his case 4. without having been juried, and the Chief of the Court. For these reasons above, he 5. would like to propose a hearing for the refund back and his intellectual property and 6. notice to the Clerk of Court when the plaintiff would like to carry out 5 USC§ 702- 7. Right of Review- A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely 8. affected or aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of a relevant statute, is entitled 9. to judicial review thereof. An action in a court of the United States seeking relief other 10. than money damages and stating a claim that an agency or an officer or employee thereof 11. acted or failed to act in an official capacity or under color of legal authority shall not be 12. dismissed nor relief therein be denied on the ground that it is against the United States or 13. that the United States is an indispensable party. The United States may be named as a 14. defendant in any such action, and a judgment or decree may be entered against the United 15. States: Provided, that any mandatory or injunctive decree shall specify the Federal officer 16. or officers (by name or by title), and their successors in office, personally responsible for 17. compliance. Nothing herein (1) affects other limitations on judicial review or the power or 18. duty of the court to dismiss any action or deny relief on any other appropriate legal or 19. equitable ground; or (2) confers authority to grant relief if any other statute that grants 20. consent to suit expressly or impliedly forbids the relief which is sought. 21. (Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 392; Pub. L. 94–574, § 1, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat 22. Therefore, the transparency of justice should have arguments between the defendants and 23. the plaintiff, a jury, and a trial court, without having been decided by the Clerk of Court, as 24. ordered dismissed like his case without having respected Ethics Policies. 25. As a result, the Paris Peace Accords has not deprived of the right to life of any 26. membership in the four nations in the Paris Peace Accords, which is why the sovereignty 27. of the Republic of Vietnam was lost by the Paris Peace Accords-After the twenty years 28. have gone by, he has begun a Vietnamese America enslaver in the United States-while 1. Amendment XII- Ratified December 6, 1865, Section 1 & 2 say, “Neither slavery nor 2. involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have 3. been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to them 4. jurisdiction. Section 2, “Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate 5. legislation. In the meanwhile, the Plaintiff’s Bright Quang has not violated crime or 6. terrorist and built animosities with the Sovereignty of the United States.” Even so, 7. United States Department of State has stated, “Treaties in Force a list of Treaties and 8. Other International Agreements of the United States in force on January 1, 2020, which is 9. why the sovereignty of the Republic of Vietnam was lost, the South Vietnamese Armed 10. Forces were detained and disbanded, and murdered approximately 300,000 men in many 11. concentration camps of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam without having sentenced of 12. judge during the Paris Peace Accords didn’t record those worsened events in this 13. International Agreements. 14. Respectfully Yours 15. Pro Se Bright Quang Redwood City Date 5 May, 2025