His case # 3:24-cv-08512 AGT. Quang v, Kennedy et al

Hislife fully opened upDidyou know after Saigon fell on April 30, 1975, didn't you? Let me tell you. In1983, he was living for the tricycles pedaled around and over Saigon City. So,he just interviewed his customers to find out how popular they were when heheard a painful story of a woman, she lived in Bien Hoa City. She said therehad been a puppet Saigon government when the father of his family, he wasreeducated by the North Vietnam concentration camp at North Vietnam. So, hisproperties were nationalized by a new government of North Vietnam while hiswife didn't have any homes to live- while she didn't seek any jobs inlivelihoods. Therefore, she heard from her Neighbor who would help herdaughters to let them across the sea. They could come to the United States. Shehad not only had more belief in her neighbor than everything in her lifebecause after the change of life, but the mountains also changed into the sea,sea changed to mountains. Her family looked like a sinking deat...

Hislife fully opened upDidyou know after Saigon fell on April 30, 1975, didn't you? Let me tell you. In1983, he was living for the tricycles pedaled around and over Saigon City. So,he just interviewed his customers to find out how popular they were when heheard a painful story of a woman, she lived in Bien Hoa City. She said therehad been a puppet Saigon government when the father of his family, he wasreeducated by the North Vietnam concentration camp at North Vietnam. So, hisproperties were nationalized by a new government of North Vietnam while hiswife didn't have any homes to live- while she didn't seek any jobs inlivelihoods. Therefore, she heard from her Neighbor who would help herdaughters to let them across the sea. They could come to the United States. Shehad not only had more belief in her neighbor than everything in her lifebecause after the change of life, but the mountains also changed into the sea,sea changed to mountains. Her family looked like a sinking deat...

Section 407 stated. "No department, agency, officer, or employee of the United States shall, under authority of this Act, exercise any direction, supervision, or control over, or impose any requirements or conditions with respect to, the personnel, curriculum, methods of instruction, or administration of any educational institution. Approved December 16, 1963, while the United States ordered by the written law which is why the United States deprived the right of sovereign Vietnam and then sold its Vietnam ally to socialism.As we, the American people, understand that the United States Congressmen hadn't been born. lived, and grew up in sovereign Vietnam, which is why the congress enacted the law to invade, coup, and detain and sell sovereign Vietnam ally to mainland China. In contrast, the Vietnamese citizens didn't vote for any congressmen, American president, that is why the United States Congress enacted the law for the sovereignty of Vietnam like the Fourteenth Amendme...

According to a waiver of sovereign immunity, which seemed to be mistaken identity between 6 the 3 Claims & Dispute Resolution treaty at Saigon, February 9, 1965, into force February 9, 7 1965, by 16 UST 140; TIAS 5773; 542 UNTS 173., and a waiver of sovereign immunity, 8 therefore, the Plaintiff would like to point this out. For example, in his case has been carrying 9 out to look like: 10 original jurisdiction over civil actions that "arise under" the Constitution, laws, or treaties 11 4 28 U.S.C. § 1331(a) grants federal district courts original jurisdiction over civil actions 12 "arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States". This means that if a 13 case's success depends on the interpretation of a federal law, the federal courts have the power 14 to hear it. This is often referred to as "federal question" jurisdiction. 15Let the Plaintiff show “Article II, Section 2, Clause 2: a waiver of sovereign immunity. 1...

According to a waiver of sovereign immunity, which seemed to be mistaken identity between 6 the 3 Claims & Dispute Resolution treaty at Saigon, February 9, 1965, into force February 9, 7 1965, by 16 UST 140; TIAS 5773; 542 UNTS 173., and a waiver of sovereign immunity, 8 therefore, the Plaintiff would like to point this out. For example, in his case has been carrying 9 out to look like: 10 original jurisdiction over civil actions that "arise under" the Constitution, laws, or treaties 11 4 28 U.S.C. § 1331(a) grants federal district courts original jurisdiction over civil actions 12 "arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States". This means that if a 13 case's success depends on the interpretation of a federal law, the federal courts have the power 14 to hear it. This is often referred to as "federal question" jurisdiction. 15Let the Plaintiff show “Article II, Section 2, Clause 2: a waiver of sovereign immunity. 1...

USSC Public Hearing - March 12-13, 2025, Day 2/ 20. 28 U.S. Code § 2245 - Certificate of trial judge admissible in evidence-  On the hearing of an application for a writ of habeas corpus to inquire into the legality of the detention of a person pursuant to a judgment the certificate of the judge who presided at the trial resulting in the judgment, setting forth the facts occurring at the trial, shall be admissible in evidence. Copies of the certificate shall be filed with the court in which the application is pending and in the court in which the trial took place. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 966.) To follow this Act, the Court may not dismiss his case, because a clear, exact case of the transparency of the American justice when the Plaintiff had never violated criminals to the sovereignty of the United States and not expressed any animosity to the American People. In contrast, the ambition of the wars of the United States has forced it, its sacred nation, and its people, and th...

Let him struggle for the transparency of American justice, which is why the plaintiff is a human person without violating the sovereignty of the United States and the rights and profits and interests of the American people, when the Plaintiff has been doing his duty, obligation, and responsibility, as in the election, and respect for the United States Constitution and law, which is why the Plaintiff would realize the equality before the United States, while his life has been burden of sufferings from the inequality of the United States had put on his life and his Nguyen family, because objective truth had no one offered to him, he must seek it himself from his mindset, or the truth would only be understood itself, no one explained it from him during the plaintiff would be sought it himself throughout the time in the American Court. Because the plaintiff hasn't looked like a young tree that has fallen inside the oldest, biggest mountain without having sounded reflected into time an...

3:24-cv-08512GTA. Quang v, Kennedy et al was dismissed by the powerful . Ethics of Jurisdiction, Let him struggle for the transparency of American justice without having political motives, but which is within 28 USC §1993 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 9: Pleading Special Matters which is why the plaintiff is a human person. The Plaintiff looks like a Native American, which is why he was enslaved and became a defendant in this super nation when he was discriminated against for his national color, while the United States enacted42 USC § 2000 2. ET seq, or so-called Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution - even worse, a Vietnamese American plaintiff didn't have access to the American justice, but the powerful pushed him to the bad Vietnamese American defendant. Furthermore, it hasn't taken place under the Republic of Vietnam, the objective truth of the Vietnamese Court would protect the honor and human dignity...

3:24-cv-08512GTA. Quang v, Kennedy et al was dismissed by the powerful . Ethics of Jurisdiction, Let him struggle for the transparency of American justice without having political motives, but which is within 28 USC §1993 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 9: Pleading Special Matters which is why the plaintiff is a human person. The Plaintiff looks like a Native American, which is why he was enslaved and became a defendant in this super nation when he was discriminated against for his national color, while the United States enacted42 USC § 2000 2. ET seq, or so-called Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution - even worse, a Vietnamese American plaintiff didn't have access to the American justice, but the powerful pushed him to the bad Vietnamese American defendant. Furthermore, it hasn't taken place under the Republic of Vietnam, the objective truth of the Vietnamese Court would protect the honor and human dignity...

Ethics of Jurisdiction, Let him struggle for the transparency of American justice without having political motives, but which is within 28 USC §1993 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 9: Pleading Special Matters which is why the plaintiff is a human person. The Plaintiff looks like a Native American, which is why he was enslaved and became a defendant in this super nation when he was discriminated against for his national color, while the United States enacted42 USC § 2000 2. ET seq, or so-called Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution - even worse, a Vietnamese American plaintiff didn't have access to the American justice, but the powerful pushed him to the bad Vietnamese American defendant. Furthermore, it hasn't taken place under the Republic of Vietnam, the objective truth of the Vietnamese Court would protect the honor and human dignity of the Vietnamese citizens who live under the Republic of Vietnam. On t...

While the truth would be believed by the powerful and enslaver is and he without having touched any truth, Author Bright Quang

How did the United Nations Organization carry out the national sovereignty of how its memberships would be respected? Bright Quang

/ Bright Quang The Paris Peace Accords have exchanged the truth for a lie, which is why the United Nations Organization has approved the Paris Peace Accords to let the United States exchange its American prisoners of war from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam to go to their homes, and then, the Vietnamese officials of the Republic of Vietnam were replaced by the American prisoners of war to let the United State throw off us to the Vietnamese communist concentration camps. When Articles 4 and 5 of the Paris Peace Accords stated: " The United States will not continue its military involvement or intervene in the internal affairs of South Vietnam." Article 5, " Within 6 days of the signing of this Agreement, there will be a total withdrawal from South Vietnam of troops, military advisers, and military personnel, including technical military personnel and military personnel associated with the pacification program, armaments, munitions, and war material of the United States a...

It is so good to hear from you. It borrows the foreign refugees; let it fight against President Trump because the foreign refugees are from Mexico. When they are rebelling, they hang their Mexican flag in order to remind the Mexican refugees that the state of California had belonged to Mexico in the past. But after that, the United States was rebought from French government invaders. For those reasons from the past, it mobilizes the foreign Mexican refugees to rebel in the state of California, let it rebel to build the civil war in the United States and then, it should push the United States into socialism like the Vietnam war after thirty years in war, it has not only torn all of the United States treaties signed with its Vietnam ally- the special matter of the Vietnam has deprived the right of sovereign Vietnam when the United States carried out Article III of the United States Constitution to sign the United States treaties with Vietnam ally. In the end, it has strongly distorted t...

Happy Father's Day The struggle for the transparency of Justice in the United States is because the United States Constitution and law belong to the American people and the United States Congress. All jurisdictions have belonged to the United States Supreme Court system without being forced or bound into the sovereignty of Vietnam. At the same time, the Vietnamese citizens didn’t vote for the United States Congressmen and super American political leaders, which is why the Vietnamese people, sovereign Vietnam, and Armed Forces have been obliged to obey the unequal American laws and treaties to let the United States freely deprive the sovereign Vietnam and sell to third Parties. Let the Plaintiff carry out the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/gop-lawmaker-flips-script-on-newsom-bass-by-defining-anti-ice-riots-with-1-word/ar-AA1GxFIa?ocid=socialshare. Let him compare to two matter, that is why the United States Congress hasn't enforced yet the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution, let Congress allow President Trump to oppress the Insurrection in California when the rebellions were flying for the Mexican flag without having flied the California and American flags. For this bad reason, the court ought to apply a writ of Habeas Corpus to send them to the jails. On the other hand, the Sovereignty of Vietnam was legally ratified by the United States Congress which is why the United States has cited the Second Amendment to allow its President Kennedy to let him send the American Armed Forces to Vietnam during the United States Congress didn't carry out the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Ironically, the After using for the unequal laws and treati...

Quang v. Kennedy et alFiling 6Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re C-24-1328 AGT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on December 20, 2024. (jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2024) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)copy placed in X:drive for mailing on 12/20/2024. Modified on 12/20/2024 (klh, COURT STAFF). Let him explain this his case to be a waiver of national immunity of the Court, that is why the Fourteenth Amendment, Section1. of the United States Constitution stated," All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process...

Quang v. Kennedy et al Filing 6 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re C-24-1328 AGT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on December 20, 2024. (jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2024) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)copy placed in X:drive for mailing on 12/20/2024. Modified on 12/20/2024 (klh, COURT STAFF). Let him explain this his case to be a waiver of national immunity of the Court, that is why the Fourteenth Amendment, Section1. of the United States Constitution stated," All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due proce...

https://www.facebook.com/bright.quang.2025/posts/pfbid0237tYV7hVRD3Hf2Tq5AtKTqManYMEpCHndEvfjy4Lb2jojxJZK54nW7TFD19J2nANl https://www.facebook.com/bright.quang.2025/posts/pfbid0237tYV7hVRD3Hf2Tq5AtKTqManYMEpCHndEvfjy4Lb2jojxJZK54nW7TFD19J2nANl