They’re Not Happy About This

Pro Se Plaintiff’s Name: Bright Quang 430 First Avenue Redwood City, California 94063 Email: quangbright@gmail.com Telepone: (650)278-9642 Prisoner No. 25807806142 Institution the Socialist Republic of Vietnam Migration& Refugees-Agreement on the implementation of special released reeducation Center Detainees Resettlement Program, with annex Exchange of letters at Washington and Hanoi, August 18 and 28, 1989. Entered into force August 28, 1989, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 450 Golden Gate Ave – San Francisco 94102 Pro Se Bright Quang | Cases No: 3: 24- cv- 08512-AGT Plaintiff | By Alex G. Tse. United States Magistrate Judge V🌹., | REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION | AND ORDER ON ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION JOHN F. KENNEDY et al., | IT IS SO ORDERED 20 Defendants | QUESTION/ PRESENTED I. Has the United States of America expressed transparency, justice, righteousness, human rights, and ethics to offer its slave war like the Plaintiff Bright Quang? II. Why did the sovereignty of Vietnam carry out the unequal American laws and treaties in the Vietnam War, while the United States Constitution remained respected? III. What did his family and him seek for a livelihood while the Government of the United States of America had deprived right to life after selling him to his enemy without having respected the Paris Peace Accords, and cast him to the jails of his enemy without regrets? IV. How does he firmly respectfully protect the visible of the United States Constitution to let us understand about the burden of sufferings and unluckiness of the plaintiff- family of the Vietnam War — even though, his human dignity was humiliated by his allied partnership and to what masterminded the American leaders of the Vietnam War had self- confessed doing wrongful action in themselves? V. What did he objectively realize cognizance of great legalistic values of the treaties, International Agreements, and the native Laws of the United States of America, signing with the Republic of Vietnam to declare in the international relations protocols of America’s fighting against communism to take place in the Republic of Vietnam on what logical basis? VI. Has his current enslaver somehow been influenced by the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) of great, powerful America in the post-war era? VII. What, somehow, does he respect loyalty, just-cause, and justice of the American ally to persuade the Republic of Vietnam to must win against communism by the native laws, treaties, and the American Constitution in a power? VII. Why did the US of America deprive Vietnam of its sacred sovereignty without having followed the American Constitution, while the United States recognized the sovereign Vietnam by a written law of a bilateral treaty? VIII. Why did the United States have the authority to tear up the Paris Peace Accords on January 27, 1973, and sell the sovereign Vietnam of the Republic of Vietnam to socialism? IX. Why did the United States bring back the Plaintiff to the United States from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam by a bilateral treaty on August 28, 1989, because a United States Senator, Joe Biden, said, “ America has no responsibility to any Vietnamese on April 30, 1975”? THE STATEMENT OF FACT TO BE COMPLEMENTED To follow the order of the Court, the Plaintiff would like to make clearly in his case and here are: First, the Plaintiff has been thought to be in trouble just because the Clerk of Court has been ordering him to file two cases at the same time, when the first case could not be judged, he continued to order him to complement for the second case, when the second case, but his first case couldn’t have completed. So, the Clerk of Court has ordered the Plaintiff to file a second one, which caused him to be in trouble while the Plaintiff is a seventy-six year-old, and to forget the many things. The court would think about his life when he was enduring for six and a half years in the concentration camps, which were a burden of suffering for a human person, and the eleven years were barbarous treatments by the Vietnamese communists. In the meantime, he had lost all value of his properties, our small business, and our possessions. Moreover, his wife and seven children were homeless, they were jobless, and his children had no schools to attend. While our properties were nationalized by our barbarous enemy, this had the US cut and ran to abandon us, since the US had betrayed us by the Paris Peace Accords signed on January 27, 1973. Why were we to be paupers? Second, a writ of Habeas Corpus didn't belong to the Vietnamese American prisoners of war, or the so-called reeducation detainees of the Vietnam War by the Vietnamese communist enemy of the US and the Republic of Vietnam, because the meaning of reeducation prisoners was brainwashed all of the South Vietnam Armed Forces and military and civil and administration and Party, they must be left the freedom of thoughts, capitalist, and patriotic nation by 122 USC§7108 (a) Actions against significant traffickers in persons or Amendment XIII-Ratified December 6, 1865. Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the US, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Let him point out this amendment, which is why the US has fallen into the hands of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, by letting them punish us. While Article 2 of the Paris Peace Accords said, “The Agreement responds to the aspirations and fundamental and national rights of the Vietnamese people, i., the independence, sovereignty¹, unity, and territorial integrity of Vietnam, to the right of the South Vietnamese people to. That is why the United States was violated to this treaty when the United States has deprived the rights to life of us, that the US has violated by 22 USC§7108 (a) not only sold the sovereignty of Vietnam to the third parties but also undermining our ideology to sell to Socialism. Furthermore, when he came to the US, he’s Subjected to slavery by the American slavery policy, he’s treated equally under 2 42 USC§ 1983. The plaintiff did not defame any of the American leaders and governmental employees when his facts were true. Second, a writ of Habeas Corpus didn't belong to the Vietnamese American prisoners of War or the so-called reeducation detainees of the Vietnam War by the Vietnamese communist enemy. ___________________________________ Came into force on 2 March 1973, the day when it was signed on behalf of the twelve Parties thereto, under article 9. ₂. See p.2 of this volume . ³. Ibid No. 13300 - ⁴. See pp. 202, 250, 328, and 393 of this volume. – ____________________ The U S and the Republic of Vietnam, because the meaning of reeducation prisoner of war was reeducation prisoners was brainwashed all of the South Vietnam Armed Forces and military and civil and administration and Party, they must be left the freedom of thoughts, capitalist, and patriotic nation. Instead, the Vietnamese communist regime didn't use reeducation for prisoners, but called the prisoners of war to correspond with the Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of prisoners of war on August 12, 1949, This International Convention was ratified for Prisoners of war by the US. During the Paris Peace Accords, the term of the prisoners of war was used by the four Parties. The US didn't apply the prisoners of war to the South Vietnamese Armed Forces. The US is following up with its Vietnamese communist enemy. Moreover, after signing a bilateral treaty on August 28, 1989, with its Vietnamese communist enemy, the US enacted S. 484- Bring Them Home Alive Act of 2000, 106th Congress (1999-2000). Therefore, the Plaintiff hasn't been covered by Habeas Corpus. Because the Habeas Corpus Act has been used by the Americans who rebelled against the US, it didn't apply to the Plaintiff in this case, because the Plaintiff was betrayed by the almost all of the American treaties, laws, the international relations of protocols, and .Special Paris Peace Accords. Even so, the Plaintiff has not only allied of the US and the American people but also protected the life of the American Armed Forces who had been operating on the Vietnam battlefields- while he didn’t have violated criminals and terrorized the Sovereignty of the US. Finally, no lawsuits were dropped against the defendant's party; that is why the Clerk of Court ordered the Plaintiff to apply for Habeas Corpus without having shown the defendants. If the Court is called the defendants, where does the plaintiff report the defendants? Where were the defendants? What, somehow, will he show the defendants? Furthermore, the prisoner of Habeas Corpus may be the plaintiff who is easily misunderstood as the defendant because almost all defendants were convicted criminals. Importantly, the Clerk of Court didn't allow him to display any argument about the meaning of each statute in his case. Should Somehow the Court understands how to explain each detailed step? According to a waiver of sovereign immunity, which seemed to be mistaken identity between? The Claims & Dispute Resolution3 treaties at Saigon, February 9, 1965, into force February 9,1965, by 16 UST 140; TIAS 5773; 542 UNTS 173, and a waiver of sovereign immunity, therefore, the Plaintiff would like to point this out. For example, in his case has been carrying out to look like: original jurisdiction over civil actions that "arise under" the Constitution, laws, or treaties, 28 U.S.C. § 1331(a) grants the federal district court original jurisdiction over civil actions "arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States". This means that if a case's success depends on the interpretation of a federal law, the federal courts have the power to hear it. This is often referred to as "federal question" jurisdiction. Let the Plaintiff show “Article II, Section 2, and Clause 2: a waiver of sovereign immunity. Instead, the plaintiff cites this Act by its title citation; however, the Plaintiff has copied the original text, leaving the Court to reevaluate whether the end of the United States treaties was the Paris Peace Accords, and this treaty should be a jurisdictional matter for the Court to decide in his case. So, here is- He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law, but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or the Heads of Departments. In the Treaty Clause, the Constitution returns to the realm of Foreign affairs and vests the power. What is the transparency of American justice expressed in the Paris Peace Accords? 4 28 U.S.C. § 1331(a) ², also known as the Federal Question Statute, grants federal district court's original jurisdiction over civil actions that "arise under" the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. This means that if a case involves a question of federal law, a federal court can hear it, even if the parties are from the same state. The key is that the federal question must be a core element of the plaintiff's claim, not just a potential defense. According to this Act, the United States Congress and the Constitution removed sovereign immunity. Let the US District Court judge by the civil procedure. (Artii.53.5.3- Qualified immunity Doctrine by U.S. Constitution) _______________ ²Mitchell v. Bailey, No. 19-51123 (5th Cir. 2020) Annotate this Case _______________________________ 5 22 U.S.C. § 1645³ outlines the purpose and procedures for settling claims against Vietnam Arising from the nationalization or expropriation of U.S. national property during the Vietnam War. It focuses on determining the validity and amounts of these claims, but does not authorize direct appropriations to pay them. According to this statute, his properties have already been described in no. 24.cv.01328-TLT, DKT which is why the Vietnam War led to many worse things that have not only taken place in his nation, his Nguyen family, and his human body, but also exposed the transparency of American Justice. Let the plaintiff analyze the clear reasons for letting the Court understand to organic roots of the Vietnam War for those reasons. The Court should realize that the claim of the right plaintiff is without having had a frivolous claim against the US. That is why the US Congressmen hadn't been born, lived, or been Vietnamese citizens, and had grown up in Vietnam, which is why the US Congress has enacted the law to invade their sovereign Vietnam ally. Even worse, a US Senator, Wayne Morse, has been holding hearings before the US Congress to delve into the core of American interests, which the judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution; the Laws... are under the mask to fight against the international communists as their ideology spreads in Vietnam by the 7 Act is H.R.7885 Pub.L. 88-205.Section 407 stated, "No department, agency, officer, or employee of the United States shall, under authority of this Act, exercise any direction, supervision, or control over, or impose any requirements or conditions with respect to, the personnel, curriculum, methods of instruction, or administration of any educational institution. Approved December 16, 1963, while the United States ordered by the written law which is why the United States deprived the right of sovereign Vietnam and then sold its Vietnam ally to socialism. As we, the American people understand that the United States Congressmen hadn't been born, lived, and grew up in sovereign Vietnam, which is why the congress enacted the law to invade, coup, and detain and sell sovereign Vietnam ally to mainland China. In contrast, the Vietnamese citizens didn't vote for any congressmen, American president, that is why the United States Congress enacted the law for the sovereignty of Vietnam like the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. According to 28 USC 1331-June 25, 1948, which is a waiver of sovereign immunity, the American government employees have never cared about their laws and Constitution when they contorted their law and Constitution. So, they have not taken responsibility. Moreover, section 407 of H.R. 7885. Pub. L. 88_205, when Secretary of State Kissinger had distorted this law, so the sovereign immunity protected him while Mr. Kissinger stated," Vietnam failures we did to ourselves." Finally, the Vietnam War was illegal in the United States Constitution. Therefore, the plaintiff Bright Quang ought to make the transparency of American Justice clear. Next, Let the Plaintiff carry out the Fourteenth Amendment. Ratified July 9, 1868, Section 1, stated, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, or properties, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." The Plaintiff would like to prove that the United States Congress has abused power to deprive the right of sovereign Vietnam, let's sell the sovereignty of Vietnam to the Socialist Republic of Vietnam after the United States Congress didn't enforce the Paris Peace Accords on January 27, 1973, while the Articles 4& 5 & 6 stated: Article 4: The Parties to this Act solemnly recognize and strictly respect the fundamental natural rights of the Vietnamese people, i.e.., the independence, sovereignty, unity, and territorial integrity of Vietnam, as well as the right of the South Vietnamese people to self-determination. The Parties to this Act shall strictly respect the Agreement and the Protocols by refraining from any action at variance with their provisions. Article 5: For the sake of a durable peace in Viet-Nam, the Parties to this Act call on all countries to strictly respect the fundamental national rights of the Vietnamese people, i.e., the independence, sovereignty, unity, and territorial integrity of Viet-Nam and the right of the South Vietnamese people to self-determination and to strictly respect the Agreement and the Protocols by refraining from any action at variance with their provisions. Article 6: (à) The four parties to the Agreement or the two South Vietnamese parties may, either individually or through joint action, inform the other Parties to this Act about the implementation of the Agreement and the Protocols. Since the reports and views submitted by the International Commission of Control and Supervision concerning the control and supervision of the implementation of those provisions of the Agreement and the Protocols which are within the tasks of the Commission will be sent to either the four parties sign the treaty to the Agreement or to the two South Vietnamese parties, those parties shall be responsible, either individually or through joint action, for forwarding them promptly to the other Parties to this Act. (b) The four parties to the Agreement or the two South Vietnamese parties shall also, either individually or through joint action, forward this information and these reports and views to the other participant in the International Conference on Viet-Nam for his information. That is why the United States didn't carry out them, but the United States has abused power to detain us. Why did the United States deprive the sovereignty of Vietnam to sell to one party of the Paris Peace Accords such as the Socialist Republic of Vietnam by a bilateral treaty signed by written law (written conversation) on August 28, 1989? TIAS, which is Migration & Refugees- Agreement on the implementation of a special released reeducation center detainee resettlement program, with annex. Exchange of letters at Washington and Hanoi August 18 and 28, 1989. Entered into force on August 28, 1989. TIAS. For these reasons, the Plaintiff carries out The First, The Third, and The Fourteenth Amendments in the United States Constitution to deprive the right of sovereignty of Vietnam. Second, 28 USC§ 4101 Defamation, Slander, and Libels because President Kennedy has self-confessed in his self-recording during, he has secretly ordered to CIA to assassinate President Ngo Dinh Diem, Third, Presidents Johnson created his doctrine's Salesmanship Campaign, Fourth, President Nixon and two Senators and Secretary of State Kissinger when they abused power to threat to cut off a head of President Nguyen Van Thieu if he couldn't ratify the Paris Peace Accords-after that, President Nixon solemnly stated, " No one will not have left behind the Paris Peace Accords, which is why we were, detained, disbanded, and lost sovereign Vietnam, and a legal government, which was approved by the United States. Fifth, President Bush said, “South Vietnam didn’t fight for their freedom, which is why they do not have it today.” Sixth Secretary of Kissinger stated and spoke, “Vietnam failures we did to ourselves, and the Vietnam War required us to emphasize the national interest rather than abstract principles. What President Nixon and I tried to do was unnatural. And that is why we didn't make it. Henry … Eighth, a United States Senator, Joe Biden, stated, ⁵ " America has no responsibility for any Vietnamese, and he will not vote to the budget evacuates them out of Vietnam on April 30, 1975. Let the Plaintiff submit to the Court that the Plaintiff and his Vietnamese people have what crimes against the US? Seventh, President Bush's son said, “South Vietnam didn't fight for their freedom, which is why they do not have it today." Ninth, General William Westmoreland stated, “On behalf of the US Armed Forces, I’d like to apologize to the Vietnamese of the South Vietnamese Armed Forces for abandoning you guys, we aren’t lost in Vietnam, but we never kept our promises with our ally, the Armed of Republic of Vietnam" because he testified before the US Congress and spoke, a war of both invasion and subversion. Tenth, Lieutenant John Kerry defamed Vietnam when he testified bearing before his Congress and said, "The testimonies were filled with emotional and horrific accounts of what their country, in a sense, had made them do, Kerry said. And by sending its men overseas to commit these crimes, America had created a monster. "A monster in the form of millions of men who have been taught to deal and to trade in violence," he said. "And who were given the chance to die for the biggest nothing in history." Because he used his Congress, he defamed his Vietnam ally when the Vietnamese people and South Vietnamese Armed Forces didn't touch his honor and dignity. When the testimonies were filled with emotional and horrific accounts of what their country, in a sense, had made them do, Kerry said. And by sending its men overseas to commit these crimes, America had created a monster "A monster in the form of millions of men who have been taught to deal and to trade in violence," he said. "And who were given the chance to die for the biggest nothing in history. For these reasons, the Plaintiff carries out 1743 Perjury -- Overview of 18 USC§ §1621-1623 and 1623 Violations because all of the United States treaties signed for the Vietnam War were published, stated, and recorded, which is why those were not enforced by the United States. In contrast, no, the Vietnamese people born, lived, and reside in the US without having voted for the United States Congressmen and any American Presidents - why did the United States Congress represent the Vietnamese people by this testimony hearing? When they didn't vote for the US Congressmen and the American president, they have not had any simple benefits and jurisdiction in the United States by the United States Constitution stated, which is why the Vietnamese people were represented by the United States Congress for the Vietnamese ethnicity to state the war in the sovereignty of Vietnam and been represented by jurisdiction to enact laws that the United States them invade the sovereignty of Vietnam without having due respect for themselves. Why does the US respect its sovereign immunity when the United States has sold its Vietnam ally’s sovereign immunity to another party? ______________________ 2. Https://www.justice.gov/fcsc/completed-programs-vietnam 8 50 U.S. Code § 1541 (a) (b) (c) - Purpose and policy. ³ Let the Plaintiff point out this Act because the US has not only abused its power to deprive the rights of life of the Vietnamese human rights, but also lacked its ethical jurisdiction. Because of the wrongfulness of the US, the lack of respect for the sovereign Vietnam, the human rights of Vietnamese ethicality, and the objective truth. Moreover, no Vietnamese parents or humans worldwide were born to raise their children to mature, let them serve in wars of the US without having earned a little bit of benefits, health insurance, and social benefits after the US used them to be cleaned out with lemon juice thrown at the lemon skin. When the American people enriched boundlessly, the Vietnamese Armed Forces were pauperism and lost their dreams of freedom of thought, which is why in wartime and peacetime, the American Leaders have not only defamed us, but also slandered and libeled us without having due culture and morality.928 USC§ 4101(1): How It Affects Foreign Defamation Cases. ³A special Act shall prove to the Court, so that the Court would understand the plaintiff who has just lost his sacred nation, ancestors, and one's life, and been ashamed and dishonored, which is why is the plaintiff defamed, slandered, and libeled for his whole life by the powerful American Leaders-for these special matters, the Plaintiff would like to carry out the First Amendment of the US Constitution is the defamation, slandering, and libeling case to be truth event's taken place in his honest life. And here are: First, President John F. Kennedy deprived the right of sovereign Vietnam. Second, President Johnson created his doctrine's salesmanship Campaign or the so-called “selling Vietnam to the other parties. Third, Commander - in -Chief Gen. Westmoreland of the American Armed Forces in Vietnam. He stated, “On behalf of the US Armed Forces, I’d like to apologize to the Vietnamese of the South Vietnamese Armed Forces for abandoning you guys, we aren’t lost in Vietnam, but we never kept our promises with our ally, the Armed of Republic of Vietnam" because he testified before the US Congress and spoke, a war of both invasion and subversion. Fourth, Secretary of State Kissinger stated, “Vietnam failures we did to ourselves." Fifth, President Bush's son stated, "South Vietnam didn’t fight for their freedom, which is why they haven't it today." Sixth, President Nixon and his two Senators, and Kissinger were together with each other. Let them conspire to threaten to cut off the head of President Nguyen Van Thieu if he didn’t ratify the Paris Peace Accords. __________________ 3. To follow this Act, no Vietnamese people voted for the United States Congress, which is why the US Congress enacted a law against Vietnam when the Vietnamese people didn't have anything against the American people. First Amendment Considerations.— First Amendment Protections for False Speech ." New York Times Co. V. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). The Court has suggested the government may not regulate false ideas, and even false factual statements receive some constitutional protection. ___________________________- Seventh, Lieutenant John Kerry came to Vietnam under the mask of fighting against communism, which is why he has been defamed, Slandered, and libeled by the Vietnamese people and the Vietnamese Armed Forces while he testified before his US Congress, allowing him to petition to earn the veterans benefits of the Vietnam War. Eighth, a United States Senator, Joe Biden stated, ⁵ " America has no responsibility with any Vietnamese, and he will not vote to the budget evacuates them to out of Vietnam in April 30,1973. Let the Plaintiff submit to the Court that the Plaintiff and his Vietnamese people have what crimes against the US? When the U S. Invaded Vietnam due to the unequal laws and the Unequal treaties, and then, after 30 years of wartime, the US sold, detained, and disbanded the Republic of Vietnam without having compensated any pensions. What did the US sign a treaty On April 4, 1961? Has the right of the US enacted the law of war in Vietnam, while we didn't have criminals against the American people? If the Court compares the terrorists of 9/11/2001 And the Vietnam War, the Court fairly realizes that to judge both events how to be fair. Why did they defame, slander, libel to sovereign Vietnam when Vietnam didn't violate the Sovereignty of the United States? Ninth, General William Westmoreland stated, “We are not losing in Vietnam, but we never kept our promises with our ally, the Army Republic of Vietnam.” And said, “On behalf of the United States Armed Forces. I would like to apologize to the veterans of the South Vietnamese Armed Forces for abandoning you guys.’ Therefore, the Plaintiff would like to carry out 28 USC§§2072and 2074- Rules of procedure and evidence; power to prescribe and Rules of procedure and evidence; submission to Congress. Tenth, Lieutenant John Kerry defamed Vietnam when he testified bearing before his Congress and said, "The testimonies were filled with emotional and horrific accounts of what their country, in a sense, had made them do, Kerry said. And by sending its men overseas to commit these crimes, America had created a monster. "A monster in the form of millions of men who have been taught to deal and to trade in violence," 6. A bilateral treaty of the US was signed and sent to the Republic of Vietnam, allowing the US To solemnly approve the treaty and send it to the sovereign Vietnam on April 4, 1961. Exchange Into force on April 4, 1961⁴, by Article III. Section 2 stated, “The judicial Power of the US shall Extend to all Cases, in law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the US and treaties made, or which shall be made,, under their Authority; _ to all affecting Ambassadors, Other public Ministers and consuls;_ to all of Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;_ to Controversies between two or more States; [between a State and Citizens of another State; _] 8 Between Citizens of different States;_;[ and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subject.] 9 In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers, and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be a Party, the Supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases As mentioned before, the Supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such exceptions, and under such Regulations as Congress shall make. The trial of all Crimes, ________________________ ⁴ Vietnam Exchange of Official Publication-Agreement effected by exchange of notes Signed at Saigon April 4, 1961, The American Ambassador to the Vietnamese Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs by 12.1 U.S.T 310 2 TIAS 4717 __________________ ⁴38 U.S. Code § 1311 - Dependency and indemnity compensation ... Jan 1, 1993 · Dependency and indemnity compensation-. Except in Cases of impeachment. Shall be by Jury, and such Trial shall be held in the State where The said Crimes shall have been committed; but where not committed within any State the Trial Shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed. 11 38 USC §1311⁵-July 30, 1947, which addresses Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) to pay to a surviving spouse of a veteran. The traditional contradiction of the US is furious when the United States solemnly approves the sovereign Vietnam in wartime, but after the successful invasion war, the US has torn up all of the United States Treaties. The United States quickly turned its back when the US Changed its allies to enemies, as the Vietnam ally was exchanged to be a notorious enemy, allowing the US to welcome its evil enemy as a friend. The US has not only completely killed its Vietnam allies to the root, but also the United States humbled itself to solemnly welcome its enemy when the dollars were brainwashed by the powerful of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and human Rights to return a worse guy. Why did the Plaintiff serve in the Vietnam War for the US, but he hasn't received any little bit of pension? What does the US carry out in the labor law when the United States deprives the Vietnamese of the Vietnamese rights? 7 28 U.S. Code § 1346⁶ (a) - United States as defendant – If the equal justice of the US has to be perfect itself, improve itself, and correct itself, the US Congress did enact 28 USC§ 1346 (a), the US as the defendant, but the court hasn’t created Difficulty for the plaintiff when the plaintiff has been carried out 8 28 USC§§ 2072 (a) - 2073- Rules Of 28 USC Procedure and evidence; and 9 18 USC§§⁷ 1621-1623, and 10of 17 28 USC⁸- USC App Fed R Civ P Rule 9: Pleading Special Matters, which is why the Court is from the lower court to the highest Court, always creates difficulty for the Plaintiff. When the Plaintiff carried out 16for 28 USC§ 2677⁹ Compromises of17 28 USC§ 1346b - June 25, 1948-Chapter 171-Tor Claims Procedure. Why did the US invade and subvert its Vietnam ally, when it had no violation, terrorism, or destruction to the US, when it has half of the Earth, including the US? So, Vietnam has more than five thousand age-old civilizations, and the US has a 250-year-old modern society; we are culturally different from each other, but the US Department of the Army Field Manual published FM 27-10, or the Law of Land Warfare. Why didn't the US follow this guidance book? _______________ ⁵ shall be paid to a surviving spouse at the monthly rate of $1,154 ⁶ The Congress took wrongful action in war, it enacted this law to provide compensation to the Vietnamese American victims __________________ 118 28 USC§§2071_2072 (a) (b) (c) - Rules of procedure and evidence⁷; power to prescribe- 2 In his case, the Plaintiff has provided all of the evidence of the truth without having defamed, Slandered or libeled anyone who was related to the Vietnam War because the rules of evidence were established by the written laws of the American leaders, and they have confessed themselves. 5Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §2000e et seq., makes it unlawful for A private employer or a state or local government” to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge Any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual concerning his compensation, Terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, Religion, sex, or national origin.” 19 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) (1). The question presented is Whether that prohibition includes discriminatory working conditions, or is instead limited to Discrimination in “ultimate employment decisions,” such as hiring, granting leave to, discharging, Promoting or compensating individuals. Again, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, which grants federal question jurisdiction, does not waive the sovereign Immunity of the United States or its agencies. While it allows federal courts to hear cases arising under federal law, it does not automatically mean the government has consented to be sued. Sovereign immunity protects the government from being sued without its consent, and a separate, Specific waiver is required for a court to have jurisdiction over a case against the government. “Sovereign immunity is the privilege of the sovereign not to be sued without its consent.” The principle of sovereign immunity, which is confirmed by the Eleventh Amendment, Provides that states and state agencies are generally immune from suit.⁸ when sovereign Immunity applies; it deprives the court of subject matter jurisdiction, thereby shielding States from suit.⁹ Thus, “[t]he Eleventh Amendment has been interpreted to bar suits against States and state agencies for money damages in federal court.”¹º Sovereign immunity does Not apply when a state waives its immunity, and in some circumstances, Congress may Abrogate states’ sovereign immunity by appropriate legislation. “But absent waiver or Valid abrogation, federal courts may not entertain a private person’s suit against a State.”¹ ¹ 28A “waiver of sovereign immunity ‘cannot be implied; it “must be unequivocally __________________ ⁷All of the US treaties, laws, and international relations protocols, were signed and stated for Sovereign Vietnam in the war, which is why the US didn't enforce them. Therefore, the Plaintiff states that they are perjured to deprive the rights of sovereign Vietnam, and so on ⁸ Id. (citing Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706, 713 (1999)). ⁹ Robbins v. U.S. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 438 F.3d 1074, 1080 (10th Cir. 2006). ¹º Tarrant Regional Water Dist. V. Sevenoaks, 545 F.3d 906, 911 (10th Cir. 2008) (citing Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 20–21, Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, 664–66 (1974); ANR Pipeline Co. V. Lafaver, 150 F.3d 1178, 1187 (10th Cir. 1998), overruled on other grounds by Hill v. Kemp, 478 F.3d 1236, 1259 (10th Cir. 2007)). ¹¹. Will v. Mich. Dept. Of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 67 (10th Cir. 1989); Wood v. Milyard, 414 F. App’x 103, 105 (10th Cir. 2011) (citing Will, 491 U.S. at 71) (“§ 1983 does not abrogate state sovereign immunity—indeed, states are not even ‘persons’ within the meaning of § 1983.”). _________________ expressed.” Similarly, “Congress’ intent to abrogate the States’ immunity from suit must It is obvious from a clear legislative statement.” Defendants argue that they are entitled To sovereign immunity, and that immunity has not been waived or abrogated concerning Plaintiff’s suit. The Court agrees. The State of California and the CFTB are sovereign Those are entitled to absolute immunity. Thus, having determined that Defendants are Entitled to sovereign immunity, the Court turns to whether Defendants waived their Immunity or Congress has abrogated it. Plaintiff brings constitutional claims against Defendants under the Fourth, Fifth, Tenth, and Fourteenth Amendments. But the Constitution does not waive a state’s sovereign immunity, and “constitutional amendments barred do not constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity." The plaintiff has identified No waiver of sovereign immunity for the type of constitutional claims he asserts, and the Court is aware of none. Therefore, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s constitutional claims are Barred by sovereign immunity. Plaintiff also brings a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the Court construes this claim as alleging negligence and the constitutional violations Described above. Section 1983 provides a vehicle for plaintiffs to bring suits against Persons “acting under color of state law” for deprivations of constitutional or other Federally protected rights, importantly, 42 § 1983 does not abrogate states’ sovereign Immunity, and states and their agencies do not qualify as “persons” under § 1983. Thus, Plaintiff’s § 1983 claim must be dismissed because it is barred by sovereign immunity. 20 42 U.S. Code § 2000d-7¹² - Civil rights remedies equalization. Which involves providing as of his right to drive a car just because he has not violated any California traffic laws or crimes, he is the best of a Vietnamese American citizen, as he was 22awarded an outstanding award by the jury by the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. While the issue in this case now focuses on competency to be executed the Constitutional Rights that is very important for the Court to understand the decision of the Mental Condition, the privileges abridged and the lack of skills of Department of Motor Vehicles that it has put these labels on the head of Mr. Bright Quang by Decision of Mrs. Barbara Schmidt and Mrs. Jackie Chahal's of Department of Motor Vehicles when Fourteenth Amendment: Equal Protection (1868) (1), which involves that provides his ________________ ¹²Eleventh Amendment Immunity: Generally, the Eleventh Amendment protects states from being sued in federal court by individuals, unless the state consents to be sued. _________________ Rights of driving a car. Even good, after the five years have passed, Mrs. Barbara Schmidt And Mrs. Jackie Chahal of the Department of Motor Vehicles, Redwood City, 300 Brewster Ave, CA 94063, Phone: (800) 777-0133, and D.M.V. San Francisco 1377 Fell St, CA 94117, phone. (800) 0133, they didn't find any used medication for his mental case, and no mistake in traffic, so they had to provide the driver's license to him. Why did they deprive the right to livelihood, his copyrights of intellectual Property, because of his literary books and pieces of artwork, to not sell at a high Value when he is a head of household without having earned a little bit of money from a job. 21 17 USC§504. (b)(d) Remedies for infringement: Damages and profits.¹³ According to this Act, the plaintiff has not only discriminated against national color, racism, but also prejudiced the sculpture culture, composition, and business, within the Equal Protection Clause is part of the Fourteenth Amendment. 22 28 U.S. Code § 2241(c)(1)(4)(5)(e) (2) - Power to grant writ.¹⁴ It outlines the power to grant writs of habeas corpus. Specifically, subsections (c) (1), (4), and (5) detail the circumstances under which a prisoner can seek this writ. Subsection (c) (1) 23 28 U.S. Code § 1915(e) (2) (B) (ii) - Proceedings in forma pauperis. (e) In his opinion, the Plaintiff thinks that no attorneys dared to counsel in his case when he had sought them fifteen years ago. Some native attorneys had their contracts cancelled when they contracted with the plaintiff. Moreover, the plaintiff carried out 28 USC App Fed R Civ P Rule 9 Pleading Special Matters because of the plaintiff has full, exact evidence from the written laws of the defendants who had confessed themselves. Again, the Court ordered the public attorneys they help, so that is well-wishing. (2) According to this citation, the Clerk of Court had ordered him to make payments for the two cases; each case was $405.00, and collateral property. However, the plaintiff didn't have any valuable property. When the plaintiff collateralized the total intellectual property of the nineteenth books and some of the figures of bronze statues, their weight was approximately 80 pounds, and the forty-two 28 special portraits of the American Presidents on oil canvas, and his two books are Justice for _______________ ¹³https://www.ce9.uscourts.gov/jury-instructions/node/708 ¹⁴ www.law.cornell.edu › us code › text28 U.S. Code § 2241 - Power to grant writ | U.S. Code | US .. ___________________ Vietnam and Vietnamese American Art were submitted to the Clerk of Court. In contrast, sometimes the Clerk of Court had ordered him to pay $402.00 and $403.00, so the Clerk of Court had returned and ordered him to $405.OO, but the second payment for the court wasn't sent a receipt, when the Department of the Treasury Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Philadelphia financial center- P O Box 51320- Philadelphia, PA 19115-6320, which sent the notice to check recipient by 18$405.00 . The Check 6 Date 06/05/25, Check Number 4039-66069619, and Schedule Number 0060402 19MCTC25. 7by 3:24-cv 08512 –AGT Quang v. Kennedy et al. That was On March 6, 2024, the second fee payment wasn’t sent any receipts. Next, (b) his case is in action or appeal because the US Department of Justice had ordered him to petition the lower Courts to the highest Court in the state of California, and then, the plaintiff should appeal to the United States Supreme Court within 40 copies of the statements of case. 24 DEMAND FOR RELIEF State what you want the Court to do. Depending on your claims, you may ask the Court to award 1you money or order the defendant to do something or stop doing something. If you are asking for money, you can say how much you are asking for and why you should get that amount, or describe the different kinds of harm caused by the defendant. To follow with 28 USC§ 633- Plaintiff would consent to this Court's determination of the number, Locations and salaries of magistrate judges. Next, the Plaintiff would ask for the funds, which are $120,000.00 (one hundred and two hundred trillion dollars) because of his claims to point out the Special matters are the critical indictments - while, the great powerful America has barbarously been conspiracy of its invasion and subversion war of the sovereignty of Vietnam from 1945 to 1975. Just because the US Congress has enacted unjust laws, the American leaders have contorted their Constitution and the White House Agency abusing the power to deprive the rights of life of the innocent Vietnamese people, selling the sovereignty of Vietnam to socialism in wrongful actions by the US Congress, destroying one legal Government of Vietnam, terrorizing the weakest Vietnamese people within thirty years, and violating criminal civics, and perjury of the multilateral and bilateral treaties, and international Relations protocols with Vietnam. For example, Magistrate Jack Smith has been judging Ex-President Trump who was perjury in the economic system which resulted in more than four hundred million wrongful investor procedures. So, the great emperor of America has not only played a war game of hoaxes in Vietnam but also has trafficked -Vietnamese people and Southern officers to use them in enslaved war to imprison them, depriving the right to freedom of thought to let the emperor American protect its a core of national interests during great powerful America has not only trampled Vietnamese human Rights down and human dignity to dirty mud without having regrets- while modern civilization, enrichment of the US is bigger more than the plaintiff trillion and trillion-fold. That is why the discrimination against National color and prejudiced Indigenous law with conscience prisoner pushed him to pauperism without having oxygen to breathe in and out which is why the life of an artist, sculptor, portrait expert, and writer and enslaved war has been abused by the modern civilized American to his marrow and bones. The amount of money the plaintiff would ask for: First, the perjury of the multilateral, bilateral treaties and international relations protocols is $400,000.00 (the four hundred million dollars by 1743. Perjury -- Overview Of 18 U.S.C. §1621 and 1623 Violations. Second, his properties, the national sacred Vietnam, and the aspirations of his ancestors in the burden of suffering are $ 200,000.00 (two hundred million) by 22 U.S. Code § 7108: Actions against significant traffickers in persons. Third, the trafficker his human right to socialism, depriving the right to Freedom of thought and the right to patriotism and wrongfully detained without having compensated any pennies and abused to pay income tax to the American Government while fighting against socialism by the US Congress ordered us, after that, the US has abandoned us without having enforced any laws in emergency refugees in summed $ 200,000.00 (two hundred million dollars) Fourth, the United States has freely deprived the right of sovereignty of Vietnam to sell its Vietnam ally to mainland China- therefore, the plaintiff demands to compensate $500,000. 00 (the five hundred millions) In fact, when the death of the plaintiff will not have a tomb, he will not be unable to buy the tomb party which is forever, so the local government will dig his tomb up, and the local government will throw his body anywhere on the waste earth. Finally, in the time waiting for judgement trial, if the plaintiff will suddenly have passed away, he would ask for the Court to give his wife, children, and Nguyen Family a successor because the USA has always declared respect for its law and Constitution more than everything in value of modern civilized America. That is why the USA has expressed disloyalty, unjust cause, and injustice in the Vietnam War when its money asked for a Court that was lower than the American honors, dignity, and a super sublime great powerful country. 25 Finally, the plaintiff had demanded gains that: 1743. Perjury -- Overview of 18 U.S.C. §1621 And 1623 Violations. Code § 7108: Actions against significant traffickers in persons 400,000 hundred million for Exchange of letters at Washington and Hanoi, August 18 and 28, 1989. Entered into force August 28, 1989, the four hundred million dollars by the United States had been traded for the sale of Sovereign Vietnam through a bilateral treaty. And the American Leaders have been defamed, slandered, and libeled by the plaintiff by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution because they invaded, sold, detained, and disbanded the legal Government of the Republic of Vietnam, and they deprived Vietnam of sovereignty. Let the United States sell to socialism. Therefore, this matter of the US should compensate $500 Five hundred Million.) If not, the United States must carry out the Paris Peace Accords, let him return to his Sacred Vietnam. His prisoner of war has followed the current policy. Finally, all of the funds transferred in his Case, the plaintiff will have built a tunnel from San Jose to San Francisco for the public American people to use and the Public American people will escape in the atomic weapon Occurring in this national state the fund transfer, he will offer to the Vietnamese wounded soldiers of Vietnam because their life was injured by this war, and then, the plaintiff should rebuild his small business as foundry bronze because his dreams are to cast bronze forAmerican Presidents by bronze, and then, he must build the Nguyen family worship, because the United States is his national home. And the plaintiff will have built the embalming house, which will be kept in his enslaver's body of war forever; he is hopeful of building the embalming corpse house. As a result, let him live the rest of his burden of suffering’s barbarous war while he composes a few historic war stories. Respectfully Yours Bright Quang Date June 28, 2025