Ukraine chính thức công bố sự thật vụ tấn công dinh thự ông Putin, bóng ...

Happy New Year of 2026, "In the face of stubborn Democratic resistance and a divided Supreme Court decision last week, President Donald Trump is stepping back from National Guard deployments in three liberal-dominated cities." According to the United States Courts have ordered President Trump that he must withdraw out of three liberal cities -- Chicago, Los Angeles, and Portland, Oregon. That is why the Democratic party had enacted the law to allow President Kenndy, let him not only deprive of the right to sovereign Vietnam but also sell the sovereignty of Vietnam to socialism. Why is the right of the United States to have killed, murdered, and detained the Vietnamese people and troops while the United States constitution did not allow any Congressmen and American leader to do that? While do they distort their law, treaties, and constitution? When the United States has stated with a saying no one is above the law, the United States Congress and leaders were deprived the right to life of the foreign Vietnamese people- who prosecute the United States Congress and leaders when they robbed their ally of Vietnam to sell to socialism, but the United States has been forced the Vietnam Armed Forces to modern enslaved war for the United States after the United States has re-bought us with zero penny from the former enemy of the United States in the detainee center re-education camps of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam. What does the transparency of Justice of the United States express for Unmitigated Punishment for offenders? Finally, When President Trump has disbanded to send the National Guards to these states above by the democratic party, the democratic Party has also ordered President Kennedy to let him rob the sovereignty of Vietnam and sell us to socialism- what has the United States Court expressed the transparency of Justice by Unmitigated Punishment for offenders? Or the United States has become to international police that international police want whatever they like to kill and assassinate anyone without having been compensated by Human Rights policies and Geneva convention on October 21, 1950. which was ratified by the American President and the Congress. How would the American elites and scholars of jurisprudence evaluate the transparency of Justice to support Petitioner Bright Quang case by the mindful prism without having discriminated against national color and prejudiced race? Let him compare between the jurisprudence and education in which: "Educated is understanding when understood for education, men should do it correctly. If men had educated rightly, they did not perform for the rightness. Their lives looked like rock which lay under the dirt. It has not had any sunshine's The scholars of jurisprudence- the social elites wouldn't acknowledge the truth, So, the scholars of jurisprudence and elites are the same as the wilder grass.