THE PAINFUL REASON FOR THE DEATH OF 3 ARVN Generals in a RE-EDUCATION CA...

Pro se: Bright Quang 430 1st Ave Redwood City, CA 94063 Phone: (650)278-9542 Email: quangbright@gmail.com The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Post Office Box 193939 San Francisco, California 94119-3939 Bright Quang ) Docket: 25-5851 Petitioner ) ODER V, ) SCHROEDER, John F. Kennedy ) RAWLINSON, Gen. Westmoreland ) and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges Secretary of State Henry Kissinger ) Filed Responders ) FILED et, al ) Nov. 12, 2025 ) December 9, 2025 ) Docket as of 12/29/ 2025 at 2:32 pm ) by Molly C. DWYER, Clerk ________________________________) U.S. COURT OF APPEALS PROPOSAL FOR REHEARING CASE The Petitioner would like to carry out Amendment XIV Section 1. Ratified July 9, 1868, which started with a saying, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States of the States wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or, or property, without due process of law; or deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law.” Amendment XIV, section 1, further provides in pertinent part follows: No the United States Congressmen or American President were born up, lived, and worked and public serviced in the sovereignty of the Republic of Vietnam, which is why they not only represented by the Vietnamese people and the Congress of the Republic of Vietnam but also enacted the law to decide the fate of a Vietnamese people’s race. On the other hand, no Vietnamese peoples’ citizens born, lived, and publicly worked in the United States that is why the United States Congress and powerful American leaders have been interfering into the internal affairs of the government of the Republic of Vietnam. While the decree order of the American President enacted the birthright that had the legal parents who are the American citizens. Therefore, the United States Congress and powerful American leaders are not had the right to enact any laws to the sovereignty of Vietnam when the United States not only ratified the sovereign Vietnam by a bilateral treaty signed on April 4, 196, in Saigon, Vietnam but also approved the sovereign immunity, which is as the same as the sovereign immunity of the United States of America. That is why the United States Congress and American President were freely deprived of the right to life of the Vietnamese Armed Forces, like the murdered, detained, and deprived the right of our properties without having sentences of judgments. In fact, the United States has torn up the United States treaties, which have solemnly signed with the sovereign Vietnam, which is why the United States has overlooked the loyalty, just cause, and justice with its ally of the Republic of Vietnam. After fourteen - years were torn up by the Paris Peace Accords to sign in Paris on January 27, 1973, the United States has disbanded the Vietnamese Armed Forces. Let the United States have sold us to socialism and sent us too many reeducation center detainee camps. That is why the United States has turned to welcome the former enemy of the United States and its ally of Vietnam, let the United States have signed a few bilateral treaties with the Democratic Republic of Vietnam in which the United States has secretly ordered North Vietnam that it must release all of the South Vietnamese prisoners of war by a bilateral treaty was signed on August 28, 1989. TIAS. And then, the United States has enacted S.484 Bring Them Home Alive, so the legal law of the United States has self acknowledged us to be the manservant of the United States without having respected the Vietnamese face, dignity, and honors, the United States was not born up us, which is why the United States has been used for the United States War and trafficked in Vietnamese soldiers, while he not only respected its American capitalism but also esteemed the world freedom, like the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. This Fourteenth Amendment has ordered with a saying, " No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the Law." For example, the United States District Court Northern District of California and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit were also created difficulty with the petitioner of the innocence - in case the lower court has ordered him for which is why the United States Courts were bound Petitioner to carry out 28 USC §2254 (a) or § 2255(a), let the Courts have denied him without having accepted his arguments. Just because these statutory above have not belonged to his case, these statutory were belonged from the American guys or illegal guys who were violated criminals from the United States Law and Constitution. Actually, This Fourteenth Amendment has ordered with a saying, " No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the Law." For example, the United States District Court Northern District of California and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit were also created difficulty with the petitioner of the innocence - in case the lower court has ordered him to file for 28 US Code 2254 (a) or 2255(a) which is why the United States Courts were bound Petitioner to carry out 28 US Code 2254 (a) or 2255(a), let the Courts have denied him without having accepted his arguments. Just because these statutory above have not belonged to his case, his case has belonged to a bilateral treaty on August 28, 1989. To provide, a writ of habeas corpus isn't a direct appeal but a separate, extraordinary legal action challenging unlawful detention, allowing review of constitutional violations or new evidence outside the normal trial record, often after direct appeals fail, asking a court to order the jailer to “bring the body" and justify imprisonment, potentially leading to release or new proceedings. It's a post-conviction remedy crucial for issues like ineffective legal counsel or newly discovered innocence, going beyond standard appeals on trial errors focused. For that reasons, the Petitioner has not only provided by rule of evidence but also cited the United States treaties have signed with his enemy and the enacted of the United States Congress was offered to the Vietnamese American re-educated center detainee by S.484 Bring Them Home Alive in which has had without due by 28 US Code§ 22 54 (a) or §2255(a). When the Clerk of Courts bound him into these statutes above to let them deny his legal trial, the Clerk of the Courts did not express Unmitigated punishment for offenders. But the Clerk of Courts has abused their powers to bully his forma Pauperism without having any counsels to help him. That is why the Clerk of Courts have Carried out a writ of habeas corpus to his trial, which isn't a direct appeal but a separate, extraordinary legal action challenging unlawful detention, allowing review of constitutional violations or new evidence outside the normal trial record, often after direct appeals fail, asking a court to order the jailer to " bring the body" and justify imprisonment, potentially leading to release or new proceedings. It's a post-conviction remedy crucial for issues like ineffective legal counsel or newly discovered innocence, going beyond standard appeals on trial errors focused. For that reasons, the Petitioner has not only provided by rule of evidence but also cited the United States treaties have signed with his enemy and the enacted of the United States Congress was offered to the Vietnamese American re-educated center detainee by S.484 Bring Them Home Alive cited 37 US Code§ 101 (3) and Section 551(2) 5 US Code §5561 (5) by 114 STAT. 2196 Public Law 106-484_ NOV. 9, 2000, in which has had without due by 28 US Code§§ 22 54 (a) or 2255(a). When the Clerk of Courts bound him into these statutory above to let them be dismissed his legal trial, the Clerk of the Courts did not express Unmitigated punishment for offenders. But the Clerk of Courts has abused their powers to bully his forma Pauperism without having any counsels to help him. That is why the Clerk of Courts has not Carried out Chapter 11, , often referring to the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, is a fundamental U.S. constitutional principle ensuring that the State cannot deny any person within their jurisdiction equal protection under the law, meaning similarly situated people must be treated alike. This clause prohibits discriminatory laws based on race, gender, and other characteristics, using different levels of judicial scrutiny ( rational basic, intermediate scrutiny, strict scrutiny) to test laws, with stricter tests for suspect classifications like race, requiring compelling government interest, while sex often uses intermediate scrutiny. It's crucial in landmark cases like Brown V. Board of Education, ensuring non-discrimination in government action. Therefore, the justice state of California has enacted 28 USC (a)(b)(1) (A)(B)(2) (C)(A) (B) (C) (D) (c)App Fed R App P Rule 40: (b)(2)(A)–(D) Panel Rehearing; En Banc Determination. Which is why the Clerk of Court’s MOLLY C. DWYER did not allow the Petitioner of petitioning for Rehearing case, let petitioner do not having a good chance to earn this statutory when the Clerk of Court did not have filed updating docket- while the petitioner has lost the thirty-days to appeal to the United States Supreme Court. In conclusion, 22 U.S. Code § 1622g - Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States; finality of Commission decisions, The Federal Act that ordered the panel commission has all right to decide his case. Because the petitioner has belonged to the mastermind of the United States that has not only invaded sovereign Vietnam but also sold the petitioner to Socialism and so on. Therefore, the duty and responsibility of the United States of America can not be forgotten when no parents were born to the child who grew up; he was forced to serve in the war of the United States without having protected the benefits of insurance. Therefore, the petitioner requested the Clerk of Court Molly C. DWYER to carry out his case before the panel commission Court, and let them have an equal decision. Furthermore, if the Clerk of Court were a Vietnamese mother of a petitioner, how would motherhood express her tribunal of human conscience herself? When she was born a child, the invaders were deprived of all the rights to life without having provided their transparency of equal justice, or the great power of America were national Vietnam, for what the Clerk of Court expressed her equal justice? The invaders continually pushed her child to modern enslaved war without having performed the rule of law. So, the Clerk of Court not only bound her law and Constitution but also prejudiced national color, race, like the petitioner has been enduring for a long life of the burden of suffering without shining light. Respectfully yours Petitioner Bright Quang January 5, 2026