His case # 3:24-cv-08512 AGT. Quang v, Kennedy et al

22 USC§1622e. Vesting of all non-adjudicatory functions, powers, and duties in Chairman of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States. According to this statute not only represents the great power of the sublime America but also symbolized by dignity, honor, and the face of the United States. But the reality of the United States Courts had pushed petitioners to the wall of the leg without having an outlet, the petitioner, sometimes, was a crazed scholar. He compared the American experts who were training him to an impressive ideological American in his National Police University, while he was taught to be a Vietnamese Police Chief by his American allied experts, and he also experienced the American laws and constitution, which all like fiction stories without having a little truth. Therefore, he ought to carry out this Act. While Section Text has cited," All functions, powers, and duties not directly related to adjudicating claims are hereby vested in the Chairman,...

/ That is why the United States has been invading for Vietnam nearby 20 years in war and instigator signed the Paris Peace Accord, but did not have an Instrument of surrender by the Article 98 of the international criminal Court when the United States has turned to sign a few bilateral treaties with Socialist Republic of Vietnam ( North Vietnam), while the United States has been signed with Laos and Cambodia.

/ INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT Agreement regarding the surrender of persons to international tribunals. Signed at Washington May 2, 2005. Entered into force October 6, 2005. TIAS 05-1006

22 U.S. Code § 1645n (a)(b) (c) - Applicability of other statutory provisions, which further provides in pertinent part as follows: This statute has allowed the Petitioner who expanded to expand on another statutory in which have related to his Civil case of the Vietnam War. In particular, from the deprivation of a legal sovereign Vietnam to defamation, to perjury, and to swallow up compensation.

The American tyrant or the transparency of Justice. Whether or not the USA has expressed its transparency of Justice or dictatorship in the Vietnam War in the United States Constitution?When the petitioner had three causes in the Vietnam War, he cited this. Given their long history, Vietnam has been up and down for more than 5,000 years, while the United States has been around for 250 years. Both nations have never had animosity toward each other; the United States has abused its power of dictatorship. The United States not only invaded Vietnam but also started a war from February 1961 to May 1975. First, the powerful American political leaders have torn their constitution and distorted their laws. Let them rob Vietnam, and then they have sold Vietnam to communism. That is why they have expressed their dictatorship without having impressed the transparency of American justice. When playing Yard of Wars, the United States should be equal because it has been using its military in wars...

/ In his opinion, the Republic of Vietnam could have surrendered a legal instrument with four sides, which are the United States, the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, the Republic of Vietnam, and the Provisional Revolutionary Government of South Vietnam, to international organizations that ratified it, which is why a legal surrender instrument has not taken place. Whether or not the Vietnam Surrender Instrument was impressed by the International Law when the United States of America was a super instigator of the Vietnam War from 1961 to 1975 without having due its transparency of America justice.? Because the American elites and the jurisprudence, they look like the ants. When they have been using their laws to protect their Americanism. About the Archive This is a digitized version of an article from The Times’s print archive, before the start of online publication in 1996. To preserve these articles as they originally appeared, The Times does not alter, edit or update them. Occasiona...

22 U.S.C. § 4101(1) Defamation — The term “defamation” Let the Petitioner provide the exact evidence of the American leaders who have not only enforced the laws, treaties in the Vietnam War but also defamed, slandered, and libeled their national ally and former Vietnamese Armed Forces. In particular, whether, or not the powerful American political leaders impressed the transparency of justice, or abuse of power to express their tyrants in the Vietnam War without having respected for their constitution?

28 USC§1331- sovereign immunity Act Let petitioner cite from this Act, “In 1795, the Eleventh Amendment was ratified in response to this ruling, removing federal judicial jurisdiction from lawsuits prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State". Therefore, the sovereign immunity of the USA is not valued in the Vietnamese American prisoner of war trial when the USA has deprived its ally, Vietnam. As 28 USC §1346, the US, as defendant, therefore, cannot be protected by sovereign immunity.

/ 28 U.S. Code §§ 2254 (a) _ 2255 (a) - Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence, That is why the petitioner has filed a writ of Habeas Corpus by the lower Courts because the petitioner didn't belong inmate who violated criminals in the US without sentenced by the US Courts. The lower courts didn't have any legal title to define the Vietnamese Comminst's reeducation center detainee in the American law and Constitution while they'd abused of powers to base on a writ of Habeas Corpus to bind the petitioner into habeas corpus to deny his legal case when the petitioner has been explained in his appeals, which is why the lower courts didn't consider the worse matters. As the petitioner has submitted the US' treaty signed with the former enemy of North Vietnam on August 18 and 28, 1989, the exchange of letters at Washington and Hanoi. Entered into force August 28, 1989, TIAS, and the Act's S. 484 Bring Them Home Alive by Congress. But they were denie...

77 STAT] Public Law 88-205-DEC. 16, 1963.Administrative Appropriations Authorized in pertinent part as follows: Perhaps, Kissinger does not only understand the Public Law 88- 205, 88 Congresses to be H.R. 7885 Section 407, Approved Dec. 16, 1963, which relates to 22 U.S.C.§ 2151 that said, "Congressional findings and declaration of policy. Let the petitioner provide to this statute: The Congress has spoken that no department, agency, officer, or employee of the United States shall, under authority of this Act, exercise any direction, supervision, or control over, or impose any requirements or conditions with respect to, the personnel, curriculum, methods of instruction, or administration of any educational institution. Approved December 16, 1963, 11 am. Let the petitioner prove that the government of the US has been supporting expansion Assistance, or the so-called Development Loan Fund, and Military Assistance to persuade the government of South Vietnam that it should achieve v...

Bright Quang Dear Bank of America, Holly O'Neill, Madam, My name is Bright Quang43o 1st Ave, Redwood City, CA 94063. I would like to report my special matter to Madam, as I need help with the reasons: When I have been troubled with my website's https://www.brightquang.net and my email address' bright_qng@yahool.com. My website was built in 2012 after I graduated from the University of Art. Let me sell my pieces of artwork, the figurines of the cast bronze, and my paintings, which is why in 2020, Yahoo. The small business was suddenly shut down by my website's www.bright.net and email. While my email was signed by the student loan officer, the government officer, and the United States Courts, I was lost the get information. So, the SuverMonkey company has been trying to convince me to restore my www.brightquang.net and email for $1.99 per month. Therefore, I agreed to let it restore my website and email. Thus, I believed it to be a Native American expert in computers wi...

In his opinion, he would analyze this case, which is why they were illegal immigrants when they were foolish, because the United States law is unequal to the law of their nation when they came to the United States, and they have a vendetta. Next, they do not respect the United States Constitution. Finally, no American lawyers counseled them. As a result, they have avenged without having contained wisdom because a bad man wants to seek quick revenge within a day, yet an upper man will be avenged for a million years, which would not last to be too short a time. Bright Quang

/ https://www.facebook.com/bright.quang.73/posts/pfbid0LVb1KunRW62XxXJD7YijS1msEZ7sYxZKQC4oswX44YzxrnYGboKqxFJPBm4biH6rl

https://www.facebook.com/bright.quang.73/posts/pfbid0LVb1KunRW62XxXJD7YijS1msEZ7sYxZKQC4oswX44YzxrnYGboKqxFJPBm4biH6rl

/ He came to the United States on November 23, 1993, when he was bringing his art. literature, and linguistics. Let him struggle for the transparency of American Justice. Because no parents were born out, the child nourished him to grow up. Let him serve in the United States for 20 years' war. And then, the United States not only abused its power to sell him and his sacred nation to communism but also distorted its constitution without having respected treaties and international law. And then, the United States not only deprived his property but also detained him without having compensated any pennies. Therefore, his wisdom struggles for transparency of justice.

https://www.facebook.com/bright.quang.73/posts/pfbid0ev6ZWdusUDyjwLoUKNzshxyYmLviAkhxxiJmRiKPWpyDHmMGmwUHZdoEwPwNtfFLl

https://www.facebook.com/bright.quang.73/posts/pfbid0ev6ZWdusUDyjwLoUKNzshxyYmLviAkhxxiJmRiKPWpyDHmMGmwUHZdoEwPwNtfFLl

Good Morning, America, If the American people live under the rule of law, we avoid the demagogy policy. For example, the United States Congress enacted S.484 Bring Them Home Alive (114 STAT.2196 Public Law 106-284 _NOV,9,2000) cited 37 U.S>C 101(3) , 5 U.S.C 551(2)-5561 (2), and 5561 (5) and Freedom Support Act 22 U.S.C. 5801 independent States. So, S.484 (3) Vietnam War._ The term "Vietnam War" means the conflict in Southeast Asia during the period that began on February 28, 1961, and ended on 7, 1975. As a result, the Vietnamese American Prisoners of war, who are in full conditions in this Act, must apply to get the benefits because we live under the modern civilization America by Rule of Law without having the Rule by law. That is why Petitioner Bright Quang came to the United States under S.484 Bring Them Home Alive because he was sold to socialism by the Paris Peace Accords on April 30, 1975. That time in the United States didn't allow him to get evacuated. Whi...

Good Morning, America, If the American people live under the rule of law, we avoid the demagogy policy. For example, the United States Congress enacted S.484 Bring Them Home Alive (114 STAT.2196 Public Law 106-284 _NOV,9,2000)  cited 37 U.S>C 101(3) , 5 U.S.C 551(2)-5561 (2), and 5561 (5) and Freedom Support Act 22 U.S.C. 5801 independent States. So, S.484 (3) Vietnam War._ The term "Vietnam War" means the conflict in Southeast Asia during the period that began on February 28, 1961, and ended on 7, 1975. As a result, the Vietnamese American Prisoners of war, who are in full conditions in this Act, must apply to get the benefits because we live under the modern civilization America by Rule of Law without  having the Rule by law. That is why Petitioner Bright Quang came to the United States under S.484 Bring Them Home Alive because he was sold to socialism by the Paris Peace Accords on April 30, 1975. That time in the United States didn't allow him to get evacuated. W...

/ The United States Courts have never expressed for the transparency of Justice, but they have abused their powers to bully their unlearned forma Pauperism without having had counsel as you know about the US Supreme Court judged by 6-3, let bane President Trump not right to send the national Guard to Illinois, California, and Portland, that is why President Kennedy and Congress have freely invaded and subverted Vietnam without carried out any laws, constitution, and international laws- what has the US Court expressed its transparency of justice in the Vietnam War? In fact, his case petitions the Vietnam War by 28 US code 1346 the United States as defendant, and S.484 Bring Them Home Alive by After a bilateral treaty of the United and the Democratic Republic of Vietnam signed on August 28, 1989, TIAS, which is why the United States Courts have pushed his case to a writ of Habeas corpus and 25-5851- Quang v, warden.

The United States Courts have never expressed for the transparency of Justice, but they have abused their powers to bully their unlearned forma Pauperism without having had counsel as you know about the US Supreme Court judged by 6-3, let bane President Trump not right to send the national Guard to Illinois, California, and Portland, that is why President Kennedy and Congress have freely invaded and subverted Vietnam without carried out any laws, constitution, and international laws- what has the US Court expressed its transparency of justice in the Vietnam War?

/ Dear sir, May you help me to petition my case of the Vietnam war? Because my prisoner of war was acknowledged by the United States Congress Act's S.484 Bring Them home alive, which is why the lower court has bullied me to file a writ of Habeas corpus when I have been explained Habeas corpus and prisoner of war are different to each other, the lower has ordered me because this did not resolve for the prisoner of war and denied my case. When I appealed to the United States Court of the Ninth Circuit, I filed a form which is habeas corpus to keep my truth when I have explained about both cases. The Ninth Circuit has denied. So, the Ninth Circuit has ordered 28 US code rule 40. But the clerk of the Court did not file my case, I have proposed a Rehearing case without having discriminated against the national color, race when I requested equal justice for all men, but the Ninth Circuit has not yet responded to it. Now, I have been filing for appeal to the Supreme Court because I have...

Dear sir, May you help me to petition my case of the Vietnam war, because my prisoner of war was acknowledged by the United States Congress Act's S.484 Bring Them home alive, which is why the lower court has bullied me to file a writ of Habeas corpus when I have been explained Habeas corpus and prisoner of war are different to each other, the lower has ordered me because this did not resolve for the prisoner of war and denied my case. When I appealed to the United States Court of the Ninth Circuit, I filed a form which is habeas corpus to keep my truth when I have explained about both cases. The Ninth Circuit has denied. So, the Ninth Circuit has ordered 28 US code rule 40. But the clerk of the Court did not file my case, I have proposed a Rehearing case without having discriminated against the national color, race when I requested equal justice for all men, but the Ninth Circuit has not yet responded to it. Now, I have been filing for appeal to the Supreme Court because I have re...

/ Hello,What can I update my assay on my https://brightquang.workpress.com? Dear Sir, "Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., introduced legislation aimed at blocking President Donald Trump from invading Greenland on Tuesday." If a United States senator, Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., were in 1963, the United States Congress has not only enacted H.R. 7885, section 407 Public Law 88-205 Approved December 16, 1963, 11:am but also not been allowed President Kennedy to let him invade and assassinate President Ngo Dinh Diem. It did not let President Johnson created his salesmanship Campaign Doctrine to sell his ally of Vietnam to socialism and not allow President Nixon to cheat President Nguyen Van Thieu by the Paris Peace Accords, President Nixon has threatened to cut a head of President Nguyen Van Thieu if he did not ratify the Paris Peace Accords. Finally, a US Senator, Ruben Gallego, was reincarnated in decade's 60 when he prohibited his senate ship's Wayne Morse, he had testified he...

\ "Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., introduced legislation aimed at blocking President Donald Trump from invading Greenland on Tuesday." If a United States senator, Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., were in 1963, the United States Congress has not only enacted H.R. 7885, section 407 Public Law 88-205 Approved December 16, 1962, 11:am but also not been allowed President Kennedy to let him invade and assassinate President Ngo Dinh Diem. It did not let President Johnson created his salesmanship Campaign Doctrine to sell his ally of Vietnam to socialism and not allow President Nixon to cheat President Nguyen Van Thieu by the Paris Peace Accords, President Nixon has threatened to cut a head of President Nguyen Van Thieu if he did not ratify the Paris Peace Accords. Finally, a US Senator, Ruben Gallego, was reincarnated in decade's 60 when he prohibited his senate ship's Wayne Morse, he had testified hearing before his foreign Affairs Committee to allow his President Kennedy to invade ...

/ Pro se: Bright Quang 430 1st Ave Redwood City, CA 94063 Phone: (650)278-9542 Email: quangbright@gmail.com The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Post Office Box 193939 San Francisco, California 94119-3939 Bright Quang ) Docket: 25-5851 Petitioner ) ODER V, ) SCHROEDER, John F. Kennedy ) RAWLINSON, Gen. Westmoreland ) and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges Secretary of State Henry Kissinger ) Filed Responders ) FILED et, al ) Nov. 12, 2025 ) December 9, 2025 ...

Pro se: Bright Quang 430 1st Ave Redwood City, CA 94063 Phone: (650)278-9542 Email: quangbright@gmail.com The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Post Office Box 193939 San Francisco, California 94119-3939 Bright Quang ) Docket: 25-5851 Petitioner ) ODER V, ) SCHROEDER, John F. Kennedy ) RAWLINSON, Gen. Westmoreland ) and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges Secretary of State Henry Kissinger ) Filed Responders ) FILED et, al ) Nov. 12, 2025 ) December 9, 2025 ...

/ Pro se: Bright Quang 430 1st Ave Redwood City, CA 94063 Phone: (650)278-9542 Email: quangbright@gmail.com The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Post Office Box 193939 San Francisco, California 94119-3939 Bright Quang ) Docket: 25-5851 Petitioner ) ODER V, ) SCHROEDER, John F. Kennedy ) RAWLINSON, Gen. Westmoreland ) and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges Secretary of State Henry Kissinger ) Filed Responders ) FILED et, al ) Nov. 12, 2025 ) December 9, 2025 ...

/ Where did the American elites and Jurisprudence protect their tribunal of human conscience and human rights?

Where did the American elites and Jurisprudence protect their tribunal of human conscience and human rights?

/The 2024 Supreme Court Fellows Program Annual Lecture with U.S. Supreme .."For a few moments on Saturday, Marco Rubio seemed to have acquired an extra job."That is why a modern great of the United States of America has gone on an old way of dictators, like President John F. Kennedy has confessed wrongful action in the Vietnam War himself.

/ "For a few moments on Saturday, Marco Rubio seemed to have acquired an extra job." That is why a modern great of the United States of America has gone on an old way of dictators, like President John F. Kennedy has confessed wrongful action in the Vietnam War himself.

"For a few moments on Saturday, Marco Rubio seemed to have acquired an extra job." That is why a modern great of the United States of America has gone on an old way of dictatorism, like President John F. Kennedy has confessed wrongful action in the Vietnam War himself.

Pro se: Bright Quang 430 1st Ave Redwood City, CA 94063 Phone: (650)278-9542 Email: quangbright@gmail.com The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Post Office Box 193939 San Francisco, California 94119-3939 Bright Quang ) Docket: 25-5851 Petitioner ) ODER V, ) SCHROEDER, John F. Kennedy ) RAWLINSON, Gen. Westmoreland ) and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges Secretary of State Henry Kissinger ) Filed Responders ) FILED et, al ) Nov. 12, 2025 ) December 9, 2025 ...